问题
I\'m trying to find the proper way to define some components which could be used in a generic way:
<Parent>
<Child value=\"1\">
<Child value=\"2\">
</Parent>
There is a logic going on for rendering between parent and children components of course, you can imagine <select> and <option> as an example of this logic.
This is a dummy implementation for the purpose of the question:
var Parent = React.createClass({
doSomething: function(value) {
},
render: function() {
return (<div>{this.props.children}</div>);
}
});
var Child = React.createClass({
onClick: function() {
this.props.doSomething(this.props.value); // doSomething is undefined
},
render: function() {
return (<div onClick={this.onClick}></div>);
}
});
The question is whenever you use {this.props.children} to define a wrapper component, how do you pass down some property to all its children?
回答1:
Cloning children with new props
You can use React.Children to iterate over the children, and then clone each element with new props (shallow merged) using React.cloneElement e.g:
const Child = ({ doSomething, value }) => (
<div onClick={() => doSomething(value)}>Click Me</div>
);
class Parent extends React.PureComponent {
doSomething = value => {
console.log('doSomething called by child with value:', value);
}
render() {
const childrenWithProps = React.Children.map(this.props.children, child =>
React.cloneElement(child, { doSomething: this.doSomething })
);
return <div>{childrenWithProps}</div>
}
};
ReactDOM.render(
<Parent>
<Child value="1" />
<Child value="2" />
</Parent>,
document.getElementById('container')
);
Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/2q294y43/2/
Calling children as a function
You can also pass props to children with render props. In this approach the children (which can be children or any other prop name) is a function which can accept any arguments you want to pass and returns the children:
const Child = ({ doSomething, value }) => (
<div onClick={() => doSomething(value)}>Click Me</div>
);
class Parent extends React.PureComponent {
doSomething = value => {
console.log('doSomething called by child with value:', value);
}
render() {
return <div>{this.props.children(this.doSomething)}</div>
}
};
ReactDOM.render(
<Parent>
{doSomething => (
<React.Fragment>
<Child doSomething={doSomething} value="1" />
<Child doSomething={doSomething} value="2" />
</React.Fragment>
)}
</Parent>,
document.getElementById('container')
);
Instead of <React.Fragment> or simply <> you can also return an array if you prefer.
Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/ferahl/y5pcua68/7/
回答2:
For a slightly cleaner way to do it, try:
<div>
{React.cloneElement(this.props.children, { loggedIn: this.state.loggedIn })}
</div>
Edit: To use with multiple individual children (the child must itself be a component) you can do. Tested in 16.8.6
<div>
{React.cloneElement(props.children[0], { loggedIn: true, testingTwo: true })}
{React.cloneElement(props.children[1], { loggedIn: true, testProp: false })}
</div>
回答3:
Try this
<div>{React.cloneElement(this.props.children, {...this.props})}</div>
It worked for me using react-15.1.
回答4:
Pass props to direct children.
See all other answers
Pass shared, global data through the component tree via context
Context is designed to share data that can be considered “global” for a tree of React components, such as the current authenticated user, theme, or preferred language. 1
Disclaimer: This is an updated answer, the previous one used the old context API
It is based on Consumer / Provide principle. First, create your context
const { Provider, Consumer } = React.createContext(defaultValue);
Then use via
<Provider value={/* some value */}>
{children} /* potential consumers */
<Provider />
and
<Consumer>
{value => /* render something based on the context value */}
</Consumer>
All Consumers that are descendants of a Provider will re-render whenever the Provider’s value prop changes. The propagation from Provider to its descendant Consumers is not subject to the shouldComponentUpdate method, so the Consumer is updated even when an ancestor component bails out of the update. 1
Full example, semi-pseudo code.
import React from 'react';
const { Provider, Consumer } = React.createContext({ color: 'white' });
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
value: { color: 'black' },
};
}
render() {
return (
<Provider value={this.state.value}>
<Toolbar />
</Provider>
);
}
}
class Toolbar extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
<p> Consumer can be arbitrary levels deep </p>
<Consumer>
{value => <p> The toolbar will be in color {value.color} </p>}
</Consumer>
</div>
);
}
}
1 https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/context.html
回答5:
Passing Props to Nested Children
With the update to React 16.6 you can now use React.createContext and contextType.
import * as React from 'react';
// React.createContext accepts a defaultValue as the first param
const MyContext = React.createContext();
class Parent extends React.Component {
doSomething = (value) => {
// Do something here with value
};
render() {
return (
<MyContext.Provider value={{ doSomething: this.doSomething }}>
{this.props.children}
</MyContext.Provider>
);
}
}
class Child extends React.Component {
static contextType = MyContext;
onClick = () => {
this.context.doSomething(this.props.value);
};
render() {
return (
<div onClick={this.onClick}>{this.props.value}</div>
);
}
}
// Example of using Parent and Child
import * as React from 'react';
class SomeComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<Parent>
<Child value={1} />
<Child value={2} />
</Parent>
);
}
}
React.createContext shines where React.cloneElement case couldn't handle nested components
class SomeComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<Parent>
<Child value={1} />
<SomeOtherComp><Child value={2} /></SomeOtherComp>
</Parent>
);
}
}
回答6:
You can use React.cloneElement, it's better to know how it works before you start using it in your application. It's introduced in React v0.13, read on for more information, so something along with this work for you:
<div>{React.cloneElement(this.props.children, {...this.props})}</div>
So bring the lines from React documentation for you to understand how it's all working and how you can make use of them:
In React v0.13 RC2 we will introduce a new API, similar to React.addons.cloneWithProps, with this signature:
React.cloneElement(element, props, ...children);
Unlike cloneWithProps, this new function does not have any magic built-in behavior for merging style and className for the same reason we don't have that feature from transferPropsTo. Nobody is sure what exactly the complete list of magic things are, which makes it difficult to reason about the code and difficult to reuse when style has a different signature (e.g. in the upcoming React Native).
React.cloneElement is almost equivalent to:
<element.type {...element.props} {...props}>{children}</element.type>
However, unlike JSX and cloneWithProps, it also preserves refs. This means that if you get a child with a ref on it, you won't accidentally steal it from your ancestor. You will get the same ref attached to your new element.
One common pattern is to map over your children and add a new prop. There were many issues reported about cloneWithProps losing the ref, making it harder to reason about your code. Now following the same pattern with cloneElement will work as expected. For example:
var newChildren = React.Children.map(this.props.children, function(child) {
return React.cloneElement(child, { foo: true })
});
Note: React.cloneElement(child, { ref: 'newRef' }) DOES override the ref so it is still not possible for two parents to have a ref to the same child, unless you use callback-refs.
This was a critical feature to get into React 0.13 since props are now immutable. The upgrade path is often to clone the element, but by doing so you might lose the ref. Therefore, we needed a nicer upgrade path here. As we were upgrading callsites at Facebook we realized that we needed this method. We got the same feedback from the community. Therefore we decided to make another RC before the final release to make sure we get this in.
We plan to eventually deprecate React.addons.cloneWithProps. We're not doing it yet, but this is a good opportunity to start thinking about your own uses and consider using React.cloneElement instead. We'll be sure to ship a release with deprecation notices before we actually remove it so no immediate action is necessary.
more here...
回答7:
The best way, which allow you to make property transfer is children like a function
Example:
export const GrantParent = () => {
return (
<Parent>
{props => (
<ChildComponent {...props}>
Bla-bla-bla
</ChildComponent>
)}
</Parent>
)
}
export const Parent = ({ children }) => {
const somePropsHere = { //...any }
<>
{children(somePropsHere)}
</>
}
回答8:
I needed to fix accepted answer above to make it work using that instead of this pointer. This within the scope of map function didn't have doSomething function defined.
var Parent = React.createClass({
doSomething: function() {
console.log('doSomething!');
},
render: function() {
var that = this;
var childrenWithProps = React.Children.map(this.props.children, function(child) {
return React.cloneElement(child, { doSomething: that.doSomething });
});
return <div>{childrenWithProps}</div>
}})
Update: this fix is for ECMAScript 5, in ES6 there is no need in var that=this
回答9:
Cleaner way considering one or more children
<div>
{ React.Children.map(this.props.children, child => React.cloneElement(child, {...this.props}))}
</div>
回答10:
You no longer need {this.props.children}. Now you can wrap your child component using render in Route and pass your props as usual:
<BrowserRouter>
<div>
<ul>
<li><Link to="/">Home</Link></li>
<li><Link to="/posts">Posts</Link></li>
<li><Link to="/about">About</Link></li>
</ul>
<hr/>
<Route path="/" exact component={Home} />
<Route path="/posts" render={() => (
<Posts
value1={1}
value2={2}
data={this.state.data}
/>
)} />
<Route path="/about" component={About} />
</div>
</BrowserRouter>
回答11:
None of the answers address the issue of having children that are NOT React components, such as text strings. A workaround could be something like this:
// Render method of Parent component
render(){
let props = {
setAlert : () => {alert("It works")}
};
let childrenWithProps = React.Children.map( this.props.children, function(child) {
if (React.isValidElement(child)){
return React.cloneElement(child, props);
}
return child;
});
return <div>{childrenWithProps}</div>
}
回答12:
Parent.jsx:
import React from 'react';
const doSomething = value => {};
const Parent = props => (
<div>
{
!props || !props.children
? <div>Loading... (required at least one child)</div>
: !props.children.length
? <props.children.type {...props.children.props} doSomething={doSomething} {...props}>{props.children}</props.children.type>
: props.children.map((child, key) =>
React.cloneElement(child, {...props, key, doSomething}))
}
</div>
);
Child.jsx:
import React from 'react';
/* but better import doSomething right here,
or use some flux store (for example redux library) */
export default ({ doSomething, value }) => (
<div onClick={() => doSomething(value)}/>
);
and main.jsx:
import React from 'react';
import { render } from 'react-dom';
import Parent from './Parent';
import Child from './Child';
render(
<Parent>
<Child/>
<Child value='1'/>
<Child value='2'/>
</Parent>,
document.getElementById('...')
);
see example here: https://plnkr.co/edit/jJHQECrKRrtKlKYRpIWl?p=preview
回答13:
Maybe you can also find useful this feature, though many people have considered this as an anti-pattern it still can be used if you're know what you're doing and design your solution well.
Function as Child Components
回答14:
If you have multiple children you want to pass props to, you can do it this way, using the React.Children.map:
render() {
let updatedChildren = React.Children.map(this.props.children,
(child) => {
return React.cloneElement(child, { newProp: newProp });
});
return (
<div>
{ updatedChildren }
</div>
);
}
If your component is having just one child, there's no need for mapping, you can just cloneElement straight away:
render() {
return (
<div>
{
React.cloneElement(this.props.children, {
newProp: newProp
})
}
</div>
);
}
回答15:
According to the documentation of cloneElement()
React.cloneElement(
element,
[props],
[...children]
)
Clone and return a new React element using element as the starting point. The resulting element will have the original element’s props with the new props merged in shallowly. New children will replace existing children. key and ref from the original element will be preserved.
React.cloneElement()is almost equivalent to:<element.type {...element.props} {...props}>{children}</element.type>However, it also preserves refs. This means that if you get a child with a ref on it, you won’t accidentally steal it from your ancestor. You will get the same ref attached to your new element.
So cloneElement is what you would use to provide custom props to the children. However there can be multiple children in the component and you would need to loop over it. What other answers suggest is for you to map over them using React.Children.map. However React.Children.map unlike React.cloneElement changes the keys of the Element appending and extra .$ as the prefix. Check this question for more details: React.cloneElement inside React.Children.map is causing element keys to change
If you wish to avoid it, you should instead go for the forEach function like
render() {
const newElements = [];
React.Children.forEach(this.props.children,
child => newElements.push(
React.cloneElement(
child,
{...this.props, ...customProps}
)
)
)
return (
<div>{newElements}</div>
)
}
回答16:
Further to @and_rest answer, this is how I clone the children and add a class.
<div className="parent">
{React.Children.map(this.props.children, child => React.cloneElement(child, {className:'child'}))}
</div>
回答17:
I think a render prop is the appropriate way to handle this scenario
You let the Parent provide the necessary props used in child component, by refactoring the Parent code to look to something like this:
const Parent = ({children}) => {
const doSomething(value) => {}
return children({ doSomething })
}
Then in the child Component you can access the function provided by the parent this way:
class Child extends React {
onClick() => { this.props.doSomething }
render() {
return (<div onClick={this.onClick}></div>);
}
}
Now the fianl stucture will look like this:
<Parent>
{(doSomething) =>
(<Fragment>
<Child value="1" doSomething={doSomething}>
<Child value="2" doSomething={doSomething}>
<Fragment />
)}
</Parent>
回答18:
The slickest way to do this:
{React.cloneElement(this.props.children, this.props)}
回答19:
For any one who has a single child element this should do it.
{React.isValidElement(this.props.children)
? React.cloneElement(this.props.children, {
...prop_you_want_to_pass
})
: null}
回答20:
Method 1 - clone children
const Parent = (props) => {
const attributeToAddOrReplace= "Some Value"
const childrenWithAdjustedProps = React.Children.map(props.children, child =>
React.cloneElement(child, { attributeToAddOrReplace})
);
return <div>{childrenWithAdjustedProps }</div>
}
Method 2 - use composable context
Context allows you to pass a prop to a deep child component without explicitly passing it as a prop through the components in between.
Context comes with drawbacks:
- Data doesn't flow in the regular way - via props.
- Using context creates a contract between the consumer and the provider. It might be more difficult to understand and replicate the requirements needed to reuse a component.
Using a composable context
export const Context = createContext<any>(null);
export const ComposableContext = ({ children, ...otherProps }:{children:ReactNode, [x:string]:any}) => {
const context = useContext(Context)
return(
<Context.Provider {...context} value={{...context, ...otherProps}}>{children}</Context.Provider>
);
}
function App() {
return (
<Provider1>
<Provider2>
<Displayer />
</Provider2>
</Provider1>
);
}
const Provider1 =({children}:{children:ReactNode}) => (
<ComposableContext greeting="Hello">{children}</ComposableContext>
)
const Provider2 =({children}:{children:ReactNode}) => (
<ComposableContext name="world">{children}</ComposableContext>
)
const Displayer = () => {
const context = useContext(Context);
return <div>{context.greeting}, {context.name}</div>;
};
回答21:
Is this what you required?
var Parent = React.createClass({
doSomething: function(value) {
}
render: function() {
return <div>
<Child doSome={this.doSomething} />
</div>
}
})
var Child = React.createClass({
onClick:function() {
this.props.doSome(value); // doSomething is undefined
},
render: function() {
return <div onClick={this.onClick}></div>
}
})
回答22:
Some reason React.children was not working for me. This is what worked for me.
I wanted to just add a class to the child. similar to changing a prop
var newChildren = this.props.children.map((child) => {
const className = "MenuTooltip-item " + child.props.className;
return React.cloneElement(child, { className });
});
return <div>{newChildren}</div>;
The trick here is the React.cloneElement. You can pass any prop in a similar manner
回答23:
Render props is most accurate approach to this problem. Instead of passing the child component to parent component as children props, let parent render child component manually. Render is built-in props in react, which takes function parameter. In this function you can let parent component render whatever you want with custom parameters. Basically it does the same thing as child props but it is more customizable.
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
return <div className="Child">
Child
<p onClick={this.props.doSomething}>Click me</p>
{this.props.a}
</div>;
}
}
class Parent extends React.Component {
doSomething(){
alert("Parent talks");
}
render() {
return <div className="Parent">
Parent
{this.props.render({
anythingToPassChildren:1,
doSomething: this.doSomething})}
</div>;
}
}
class Application extends React.Component {
render() {
return <div>
<Parent render={
props => <Child {...props} />
}/>
</div>;
}
}
Example at codepen
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32370994/how-to-pass-props-to-this-props-children