increment a count value outside parallel.foreach scope

问题

How can I increment an integer value outside the scope of a parallel.foreach loop? What's is the lightest way to synchronize access to objects outside parallel loops?

var count = 0;
Parallel.ForEach(collection, item =>
{
  action(item);
  // increment count??
}

回答1:

I like to beat dead horses! :)

The "lightest" way to increment the count from multiple threads is:

Interlocked.Increment(ref count);

But as others have pointed out: if you're doing it inside Parallel.ForEach then you're probably doing something wrong.

I'm suspecting that for some reason you're using ForEach but you need an index to the item you're processing (it will never work with Parallel.ForEach). Am I close? Why do you need the count? What sort of VooDoo magic are you trying to do?

UPDATE:

You seem to be safe with the ConcurrentDictionary if your key is the URI and the value is TAnswer. I don't see a problem as long as you don't try to use the count to reference elements in your collection.

Finally...

If you need a counter, then use the Parallel.For loop... it safely increments the counter for you.

回答2:

Use Interlocked.Increment.

I wouldn't increment things inside a parallel foreach (unless, of course, you're using Interlocked.Increment or some other locking mechanism). That's not what it's for. The Parallel foreach should be run only with actions that cause no side effects in shared state. To increment a value in a parallel foreach will cause the very problem you're more than likely trying to avoid.

回答3:

Use Interlocked.Increment method in this way.

int count = 0;
Parallel.ForEach(users, (u) =>
{
    var currentCount = Interlocked.Increment(ref count);
    Log(String.Format("Step {0} of {1}", currentCount, users.Count));
});

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2394447/increment-a-count-value-outside-parallel-foreach-scope

标签

synchronization

locking

parallel-processing