Timeout Pattern - How bad is Thread.Abort really?

自作多情 提交于 2019-11-26 15:31:31

Potentially very bad.

The aborted thread could leave shared state corrupted, could leave asynchronous operations running, ...

See Joe Duffy's blog: "Managed code and asynchronous exception hardening".

Jon Skeet

Basically you're talking about aborting an action which (as far as we know) has no graceful way of aborting.

That means there's going to be no safe way of aborting it. Thread.Abort is just not a nice thing to do - there are various race conditions and ugly situations you can get into (see the link in Richard's answer). I would try desperately hard to avoid wanting to cancel actions that don't know about cancellation - and if you absolutely have to do it, consider restarting the whole app afterwards, as you may no longer be in a sane state.

It's bad because the thread might be in an inconsistent state or in the middle of some work, and not have the opportunity to clear itself up.

To close it properly, you signal for it to stop what it's doing by calling a method or setting a property, then do Thread.Join to wait until it closes before closing your application or moving onto other tasks.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!