I understand it's off topic, I couldn't find anywhere online and I was thinking maybe programming gurus in the community might know this.
I usually use
kill -9 pid
to kill the job. I always wondered the origin of 9. I looked it up online, and it says
"9 Means KILL signal that is not catchable or ignorable. In other words it would signal process (some running application) to quit immediately" (source: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_kill_-9_do_in_unix_in_its_entirety)
But, why 9? and what about the other numbers? is there any historical significance or because of the architecture of Unix?
See the wikipedia article on Unix signals for the list of other signals. SIGKILL just happened to get the number 9.
You can as well use the mnemonics, as the numbers:
kill -SIGKILL pid
There were 8 other signals they came up with first.
I think a better answer here is simply this:
mike@sleepycat:~☺ kill -l
1) SIGHUP 2) SIGINT 3) SIGQUIT 4) SIGILL 5) SIGTRAP
6) SIGABRT 7) SIGBUS 8) SIGFPE 9) SIGKILL 10) SIGUSR1
11) SIGSEGV 12) SIGUSR2 13) SIGPIPE 14) SIGALRM 15) SIGTERM
16) SIGSTKFLT 17) SIGCHLD 18) SIGCONT 19) SIGSTOP 20) SIGTSTP
21) SIGTTIN 22) SIGTTOU 23) SIGURG 24) SIGXCPU 25) SIGXFSZ
26) SIGVTALRM 27) SIGPROF 28) SIGWINCH 29) SIGIO 30) SIGPWR
31) SIGSYS 34) SIGRTMIN 35) SIGRTMIN+1 36) SIGRTMIN+2 37) SIGRTMIN+3
38) SIGRTMIN+4 39) SIGRTMIN+5 40) SIGRTMIN+6 41) SIGRTMIN+7 42) SIGRTMIN+8
43) SIGRTMIN+9 44) SIGRTMIN+10 45) SIGRTMIN+11 46) SIGRTMIN+12 47) SIGRTMIN+13
48) SIGRTMIN+14 49) SIGRTMIN+15 50) SIGRTMAX-14 51) SIGRTMAX-13 52) SIGRTMAX-12
53) SIGRTMAX-11 54) SIGRTMAX-10 55) SIGRTMAX-9 56) SIGRTMAX-8 57) SIGRTMAX-7
58) SIGRTMAX-6 59) SIGRTMAX-5 60) SIGRTMAX-4 61) SIGRTMAX-3 62) SIGRTMAX-2
63) SIGRTMAX-1 64) SIGRTMAX
As for the "significance" of 9... I would say there is probably none. According to The Linux Programming Interface(p 388):
Each signal is defined as a unique (small) integer, starting sequentially from 1. These integers are defined in with symbolic names of the form SIGxxxx . Since the actual numbers used for each signal vary across implementations, it is these symbolic names that are always used in programs.
First you need to know what are Signals in Unix-like systems (It'll take just few minutes).
Signals, are software interrupts sent to a (running) program to indicate that an important event has occurred.
The events can vary from user requests to illegal memory access errors. Some signals, such as the interrupt signal, indicate that a user has asked the program to do something that is not in the usual flow of control.
There are several types of Signals we can use - to get a full list of all the available/possible Signals use "$ kill -l" command:
In the above output it's clearly visible, that each Signal has a 'signal number' (e.g. 1, 2, 3) and a 'signal name' (e.g. SIGUP, SIGINT, SIGQUIT) associated with it. For a detailed look up what each and every Signal does, visit this link.
Finally, coming to the question "Why number 9 in kill -9 command":
There are several methods of delivering signals to a program or script. One of commonly used method for sending signal is to use the kill command - the basic syntax is:
$ kill -signal pid
Where signal is either the number or name of the signal, followed by the process Id (pid) to which the signal will be sent.
For example - -SIGKILL (or -9), signal kills the process immediately.
$ kill -SIGKILL 1001
and
$ kill -9 1001
both command are one the same thing i.e. above we have used the 'signal name', and later we have used 'signal number'.
Verdict: One has an open choice to whether use the 'signal name' or 'signal number' with the kill command.
It's a reference to "Revoulution 9" by the Beatles. A collection of strung together sound clips and found noises, this recording features John Lennon repeating over and over "Number 9, Number 9..." Further, this song drew further attention in 1969 when it was discovered that when played backwards, John seemed to be saying "Turn me on, dead man..."
Therefore the ninth signal was destined to be the deadliest of the kill signals.
There’s a very long list of Unix signals, which you can view on Wikipedia. Somewhat confusingly, you can actually use kill to send any signal to a process. For instance, kill -SIGSTOP 12345 forces process 12345 to pause its execution, while kill -SIGCONT 12345 tells it to resume. A slightly less cryptic version of kill -9 is kill -SIGKILL.
why kill -9 : the number 9 in the list of signals has been chosen to be SIGKILL in reference to "kill the 9 lives of a cat".
SIGKILL use to kill the process. SIGKILL can not be ignored or handled. In Linux, Ways to give SIGKILL.
kill -9 <process_pid>
kill -SIGKILL <process_pid>
killall -SIGKILL <process_name>
killall -9 <process_name>
Type the kill -l command on your shell
you will found that at 9th number [ 9) SIGKILL ], so one can use either kill -9 or kill -SIGKILL
SIGKILL is sure kill signal, It can not be dis-positioned, ignore or handle. It always work with its default behaviour, which is to kill the process.
The -9 is the signal_number, and specifies that the kill message sent should be of the KILL (non-catchable, non-ignorable) type.
kill -9 pid
Which is same as below.
kill -SIGKILL pid
Without specifying a signal_number the default is -15, which is TERM (software termination signal). Typing kill <pid> is the same as kill -15 <pid>.
Both are same as kill -sigkill processID, kill -9 processID. Its basically for forced termination of the process.
there are some process which cannot be kill like this "kill %1" . if we have to terminate that process so special command is used to kill that process which is kill -9. eg open vim and stop if by using ctrl+z then see jobs and after apply kill process than this process will not terminated so here we use kill -9 command for terminating.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9951556/why-number-9-in-kill-9-command-in-unix