问题
C++ std::priority_queue just need a partial order. But if its implementation is a binary heap, how does it works?
For example: assume we have a partially ordered set ( {a, b, c, x}, {c < b, b < a, c < a} )
, x
has nothing to do with a
, b
, c
. Then a max-heap is:
layer 1: x
layer 2: b x
layer 3: x x a c
After a pop operation, in a way commonly seen in text books, i.e. replace the root with c
and decrease the size by 1. Then we need to heapify the tree below, at the root:
layer 1: c
layer 2: b x
layer 3: x x a
We will swap c
and b
as c < b
, won't we? And what? We still don't have a valid heap since b < a
. But b
cannot "see" a
.
回答1:
The requirement for priority_queue
is (§23.6.4 of the C++ Standard) that the comparator defines a strict, weak ordering. The latter is defined in §25.4/4 as follows:
The term strict refers to the requirement of an irreflexive relation (!comp(x, x) for all x), and the term weak to requirements that are not as strong as those for a total ordering, but stronger than those for a partial ordering. If we define equiv(a, b) as !comp(a, b) && !comp(b, a), then the requirements are that comp and equiv both be transitive relations:
— comp(a, b) && comp(b, c) implies comp(a, c)
— equiv(a, b) && equiv(b, c) implies equiv(a, c) [ Note: Under these conditions, it can be shown that
i) equiv is an equivalence relation
ii) comp induces a well-defined relation on the equivalence classes determined by equiv
iii) The induced relation is a strict total ordering. — end note ]
In other words, the comparator-defined relation does not have to be total, but it must be total with respect to the equivalence classes defined by a hypothetical relation equiv
, which defines all elements as equal that are not less-than or greater-than each other.
To put it in even simpler terms, any elements not covered by the comparator relation will be treated as equal.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12419603/is-partial-order-in-contrast-to-total-order-enough-to-build-a-heap