Best way to load module/class from lib folder in Rails 3?

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-11-25 23:29:30

问题


Since the latest Rails 3 release is not auto-loading modules and classes from lib anymore, what would be the best way to load them?

From github:

A few changes were done in this commit:

Do not autoload code in *lib* for applications (now you need to explicitly 
require them). This makes an application behave closer to an engine 
(code in lib is still autoloaded for plugins);

回答1:


As of Rails 2.3.9, there is a setting in config/application.rb in which you can specify directories that contain files you want autoloaded.

From application.rb:

# Custom directories with classes and modules you want to be autoloadable.
# config.autoload_paths += %W(#{config.root}/extras)



回答2:


# Autoload lib/ folder including all subdirectories
config.autoload_paths += Dir["#{config.root}/lib/**/"]

Source: Rails 3 Quicktip: Autoload lib directory including all subdirectories, avoid lazy loading

Please mind that files contained in the lib folder are only loaded when the server is started. If you want the comfort to autoreload those files, read: Rails 3 Quicktip: Auto reload lib folders in development mode. Be aware that this is not meant for a production environment since the permanent reload slows down the machine.




回答3:


The magic of autoloading stuff

I think the option controlling the folders from which autoloading stuff gets done has been sufficiently covered in other answers. However, in case someone else is having trouble stuff loaded though they've had their autoload paths modified as required, then this answer tries to explain what is the magic behind this autoload thing.

So when it comes to loading stuff from subdirectories there's a gotcha or a convention you should be aware. Sometimes the Ruby/Rails magic (this time mostly Rails) can make it difficult to understand why something is happening. Any module declared in the autoload paths will only be loaded if the module name corresponds to the parent directory name. So in case you try to put into lib/my_stuff/bar.rb something like:

module Foo
  class Bar
  end
end

It will not be loaded automagically. Then again if you rename the parent dir to foo thus hosting your module at path: lib/foo/bar.rb. It will be there for you. Another option is to name the file you want autoloaded by the module name. Obviously there can only be one file by that name then. In case you need to split your stuff into many files you could of course use that one file to require other files, but I don't recommend that, because then when on development mode and you modify those other files then Rails is unable to automagically reload them for you. But if you really want you could have one file by the module name that then specifies the actual files required to use the module. So you could have two files: lib/my_stuff/bar.rb and lib/my_stuff/foo.rb and the former being the same as above and the latter containing a single line: require "bar" and that would work just the same.

P.S. I feel compelled to add one more important thing. As of lately, whenever I want to have something in the lib directory that needs to get autoloaded, I tend to start thinking that if this is something that I'm actually developing specifically for this project (which it usually is, it might some day turn into a "static" snippet of code used in many projects or a git submodule, etc.. in which case it definitely should be in the lib folder) then perhaps its place is not in the lib folder at all. Perhaps it should be in a subfolder under the app folder· I have a feeling that this is the new rails way of doing things. Obviously, the same magic is in work wherever in you autoload paths you put your stuff in so it's good to these things. Anyway, this is just my thoughts on the subject. You are free to disagree. :)


UPDATE: About the type of magic..

As severin pointed out in his comment, the core "autoload a module mechanism" sure is part of Ruby, but the autoload paths stuff isn't. You don't need Rails to do autoload :Foo, File.join(Rails.root, "lib", "my_stuff", "bar"). And when you would try to reference the module Foo for the first time then it would be loaded for you. However what Rails does is it gives us a way to try and load stuff automagically from registered folders and this has been implemented in such a way that it needs to assume something about the naming conventions. If it had not been implemented like that, then every time you reference something that's not currently loaded it would have to go through all of the files in all of the autoload folders and check if any of them contains what you were trying to reference. This in turn would defeat the idea of autoloading and autoreloading. However, with these conventions in place it can deduct from the module/class your trying to load where that might be defined and just load that.




回答4:


Warning: if you want to load the 'monkey patch' or 'open class' from your 'lib' folder, don't use the 'autoload' approach!!!

  • "config.autoload_paths" approach: only works if you are loading a class that defined only in ONE place. If some class has been already defined somewhere else, then you can't load it again by this approach.

  • "config/initializer/load_rb_file.rb" approach: always works! whatever the target class is a new class or an "open class" or "monkey patch" for existing class, it always works!

For more details , see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/6797707/445908




回答5:


Very similar, but I think this is a little more elegant:

config.autoload_paths += Dir["#{config.root}/lib", "#{config.root}/lib/**/"]



回答6:


In my case I was trying to simply load a file directly under the lib dir.

Within application.rb...

require '/lib/this_file.rb' 

wasn't working, even in console and then when I tried

require './lib/this_file.rb' 

and rails loads the file perfectly.

I'm still pretty noob and I'm not sure why this works but it works. If someone would like to explain it to me I'd appreciate it :D I hope this helps someone either way.




回答7:


I had the same problem. Here is how I solved it. The solution loads the lib directory and all the subdirectories (not only the direct). Of course you can use this for all directories.

# application.rb
config.autoload_paths += %W(#{config.root}/lib)
config.autoload_paths += Dir["#{config.root}/lib/**/"]



回答8:


config.autoload_paths does not work for me. I solve it in other way

Ruby on rails 3 do not automatic reload (autoload) code from /lib folder. I solve it by putting inside ApplicationController

Dir["lib/**/*.rb"].each do |path|
  require_dependency path
end 



回答9:


If only certain files need access to the modules in lib, just add a require statement to the files that need it. For example, if one model needs to access one module, add:

require 'mymodule'

at the top of the model.rb file.




回答10:


As of Rails 5, it is recommended to put the lib folder under app directory or instead create other meaningful name spaces for the folder as services , presenters, features etc and put it under app directory for auto loading by rails.

Please check this GitHub Discussion Link as well.




回答11:


There are several reasons you could have problems loading from lib - see here for details - http://www.williambharding.com/blog/technology/rails-3-autoload-modules-and-classes-in-production/

  • fix autoload path
  • threadsafe related
  • naming relating
  • ...



回答12:


Spell the filename correctly.

Seriously. I battled with a class for an hour because the class was Governance::ArchitectureBoard and the file was in lib/governance/architecture_baord.rb (transposed O and A in "board")

Seems obvious in retrospect, but it was the devil tracking that down. If the class is not defined in the file that Rails expects it to be in based on munging the class name, it is simply not going to find it.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3356742/best-way-to-load-module-class-from-lib-folder-in-rails-3

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!