Why would QueryInterface() fail when the interface is surely implemented and has built-in marshaller in Windows?

a 夏天 提交于 2019-12-02 06:22:22

问题


I have the following setup. There's a COM server that is installed into COM+ (to run in a separate process) and has this interface definition:

[object, uuid("InterfaceIdHere"), nonextensible, oleautomation, hidden]
interface IMyInterface : IUnknown {
   HRESULT MyMethod( [in] IUnknown* param );
};

The caller calls it like this:

HRESULT callComObject(IStream* stream)
{
    return comObject->MyMethod(stream);
}

Note that here IStream* is implicitly upcasted to IUnknown*. This is done because declaring a parameter of type IStream* in IDL caused some problems that I can't recall right now. Anyway it's always a valid IStream* that is passed in place of IUnknown*.

The COM server side has this implementation of MyMethod():

STDMETHODIMP CServer::MyMethod(IUnknown* param)
{
    if(param == 0) {
       return E_INVALIDARG;
    }   
    ATL::CComQIPtr<IStream> stream(param);
    if(stream == 0) {
       return E_INVALIDARG;// control passes HERE
    }
    // whatever
}

So I have IStream* passed into callComObject() on the client side which is implicitly upcasted to IUnknown* and the latter is passed to the COM marshaller. The marshalled IUnknown* reaches the server in another process and there IUnknown* is obtained and then there's a QueryInterface() call to marshall IStream* from the same object and that QueryInterface() fails.

This looks insane, because marshalling IStream* should just work at all times - there's a marshaller for this interface pre-installed in Windows.

Why could it possible not work and how do I find the reason?


回答1:


One of the possible scenarios that matches the behavior is the following:

  • you don't have any marhshaling between caller and callee
  • the interface pointer is valid
  • however the object which implements IStream, does not have a corresponding COM_INTERFACE_ENTRY map entry and does not make the interface available, the caller might have obtained the pointer via non-COM way, e.g. direct C++ cast

This is easy to check by QueryInterface'ing the stream on the caller side before the call.

The callee in this scenario can just reinterpret_cast to IStream and have it nicely working.




回答2:


You can either have your IDL import objidl.idl, or define IStream (and ancestors) manually in your own IDL (just be sure to use the standard IID value for it). Then you can use IStream instead of IUnknown as your parameter type and not worry about QueryInterface() anymore.




回答3:


you may replace IUnknown by IDispatch as parameter type of your method. In my mind, the server actually has a stub instead of the stream itself since it is in another process.

this is just a guess

I hope this helps



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16590106/why-would-queryinterface-fail-when-the-interface-is-surely-implemented-and-has

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!