Why different behavior for “TYPE* const” pointers?

萝らか妹 提交于 2019-12-02 03:18:11
  1. As others have said, this is undefined behaviour since it attempts to modify a const object. If you initialise it with zero then the compiler might treat it as a compile-time constant, and ignore any attempt to modify it. Or it might do something entirely different.

  2. this is not an ordinary variable of type TYPE * const; it is an rvalue expression of type TYPE *. This means that it cannot be used as the target of an assignment expression, or bound to a non-constant reference, at all.

Is doing such typecasting is undefined behavior ?

Yes.

(D*&)p = new D;

It invokes undefined behavior, as it tries to change the const pointer.

Recall that D* const p declares a variable p which is a const pointer to non-const D.

D* const p = 0;

This declaration says that p is a pointer to D that is constant, that is it will never, ever change. It is always 0.

cout<<"p = "<<p<<endl;

Here you display the value of p, which you earlier said would always be 0. Guess why a 0 is displayed!

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!