Can I extend the console object (for rerouting the logging) in javascript?

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-26 14:16:24

问题


Is it possible to extend the console object?

I tried something like:

Console.prototype.log = function(msg){
    Console.prototype.log.call(msg);
    alert(msg);
}

But this didn't work. I want to add additional logging to the console object via a framework like log4javascript and still use the standard console object (in cases where log4javascript is not available) in my code.

Thanks in advance!


回答1:


Try following:

(function() {
    var exLog = console.log;
    console.log = function(msg) {
        exLog.apply(this, arguments);
        alert(msg);
    }
})()



回答2:


Use the proxy pattern, see my answer for a similar case:

JavaScript: Overriding alert()

Hope this helps




回答3:


You Can Also add log Time in This Way :

added Momentjs or use New Date() instead of moment.

var oldConsole = console.log;
console.log = function(){
    var timestamp = "[" + moment().format("YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss:SSS") + "] ";
    Array.prototype.unshift.call(arguments, timestamp);
    oldConsole.apply(this, arguments);
};



回答4:


// console aliases and verbose logger - console doesnt prototype
var c = console;
c.l = c.log,
c.e = c.error,
c.v = c.verbose = function() {
    if (!myclass || !myclass.verbose) // verbose switch
        return;
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); // toArray
    args.unshift('Verbose:');
    c.l.apply(this, args); // log
};

// you can then do
var myclass = new myClass();
myclass.prototype.verbose = false;
// generally these calls would be inside your class
c.v('1 This will NOT log as verbose == false');
c.l('2 This will log');
myclass.verbose = true;
c.v('3 This will log');

I noted that the above use of Array.prototype.unshift.call by nitesh is a better way to add the 'Verbose:' tag.




回答5:


For ECMAScript 2015 and later

You can use the newer Proxy feature from the ECMAScript 2015 standard to "hijack" the global console.log.

Source-Code

'use strict';

class Mocker {
  static mockConsoleLog() {
    Mocker.oldGlobalConsole = window.console;

    window.console = new Proxy(window.console, {
      get(target, property) {
        if (property === 'log') {
          return function(...parameters) {
            Mocker.consoleLogReturnValue = parameters.join(' ');
          }
        }

        return target[property];
      }
    });
  }

  static unmockConsoleLog() {
    window.console = Mocker.oldGlobalConsole;
  }
}

Mocker.mockConsoleLog();

console.log('hello'); // nothing happens here

Mocker.unmockConsoleLog();

if (Mocker.consoleLogReturnValue === 'hello') {
  console.log('Hello world!'); // Hello world!
  alert(Mocker.consoleLogReturnValue);
  // anything you want to do with the console log return value here...
}

Online Demo

Repl.it.

Node.js users...

... I do not forget you. You can take this source-code and replace window.console by gloabl.console to properly reference the console object (and of course, get rid of the alert call). In fact, I wrote this code initially and tested it on Node.js.




回答6:


It's really the same solution some others have given, but I believe this is the most elegant and least hacky way to accomplish this. The spread syntax (...args) makes sure not a single argument is lost.

var _console={...console}

console.log = function(...args) {
    var msg = {...args}[0];
    //YOUR_CODE
    _console.log(...args);
}


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9277780/can-i-extend-the-console-object-for-rerouting-the-logging-in-javascript

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!