问题
Been extensively testing the SharedPreferences
framework. While most works as one would expect I run across some cases where I wonder what's the reasoning behind them. I give some tests all of which pass - their common set up is :
Context ctx;
SharedPreferences prefs;
Editor ed;
protected void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
ctx = getContext();
prefs = PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(ctx);
ed = prefs.edit();
}
protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
if (ed != null) ed.clear().commit();
super.tearDown();
}
Now the weird points :
When I put a null value in, I have to ask for it with a null default to get it back - if the default is non null I get this default back. Even if the default is of a different type from the one I put in. Applies to
String
andSet<String>
(but I can get back a boolean for instance) :public void testNullString() { ed.putString("string_key", null); // putString() and putStringSet() only ed.commit(); assertTrue(prefs.contains("string_key")); assertEquals(null, prefs.getString("string_key", null)); // if I specify a non null default I get this default back, not null assertEquals("a string", prefs.getString("string_key", "a string")); // *even if I ask for a boolean* assertEquals(true, prefs.getBoolean("string_key", true)); }
I can easily put a
Set<Integer>
inside the prefs :@SuppressWarnings("unchecked") @TargetApi(Build.VERSION_CODES.HONEYCOMB) public void testNullStringSetsRaw() { if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.HONEYCOMB) { @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") final Set integerHashSet = new HashSet(); integerHashSet.add(1); ed.putStringSet("set_key", integerHashSet); ed.commit(); final Set<String> defValues = new HashSet<String>(); defValues.add("a string"); Set<String> s = prefs.getStringSet("set_key", defValues); final String msg = "The set I put in: " + integerHashSet + " and what I got out :" + s; Log.e(TAG, msg); // the same - [1] assertTrue(msg, integerHashSet.equals(s)); assertTrue(s.contains(1)); // ! } }
What's the deal with null keys ? They seem to be perfectly legal keys:
public void testNullKeyNonNullString() { final String NULL_KEY = null; ed.putString(NULL_KEY, "a string"); ed.commit(); assertTrue("Contains null key", prefs.contains(NULL_KEY)); assertEquals("Retrieve the value giving null default", "a string", prefs.getString(NULL_KEY, null)); assertEquals("Retrieve the value giving default", "a string", prefs.getString(NULL_KEY, "a string" + "blah")); try { // no deal ! prefs.getBoolean(NULL_KEY, true); fail("Expected CCE"); } catch (ClassCastException e) {} }
but I have seen in my logs things like :
org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: Map value without name attribute: boolean
- see android getSharedPreferences error: Map value without name attribute: boolean for a discussion. I wonder if this is related tonull
keys. EDIT : it is related- reproducer :public class XmlExceptionTest extends AndroidTestCase { /** Run it twice - on the second run the exception is thrown */ public void testXmlException() { Context ctx = getContext(); SharedPreferences prefs = PreferenceManager .getDefaultSharedPreferences(ctx);//exception thrown here(line 18) // and apparently it clears the prefs as the condition below is false if (prefs.contains("run_once")) { // false Log.w("XmlExceptionTest", "contains null key :" + prefs.contains(null)); } Editor e = prefs.edit(); e.putBoolean("run_once", true).commit(); e.putString(null, "I put a sting with null key").commit(); assertTrue("Contains null", prefs.contains(null)); PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(ctx); // exception // NOT thrown here - why ? - apparently there is a static factory // returning the instance it already constructed // e.clear().commit(); // this eliminates the exception } }
exception :
W/ApplicationContext(): getSharedPreferences W/ApplicationContext(): org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: Map value without name attribute: string W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readThisMapXml(XmlUtils.java:521) W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readThisValueXml(XmlUtils.java:733) W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readValueXml(XmlUtils.java:667) W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readMapXml(XmlUtils.java:470) W/ApplicationContext(): at android.app.ContextImpl.getSharedPreferences(ContextImpl.java:361) W/ApplicationContext(): at android.preference.PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(PreferenceManager.java:348) W/ApplicationContext(): at gr.uoa.di.android.helpers.test.XmlExceptionTest.testXmlException(XmlExceptionTest.java:18) W/ApplicationContext(): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) W/ApplicationContext(): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154) W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127) W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118) W/ApplicationContext(): at android.test.AndroidTestRunner.runTest(AndroidTestRunner.java:169) W/ApplicationContext(): at android.test.AndroidTestRunner.runTest(AndroidTestRunner.java:154) W/ApplicationContext(): at android.test.InstrumentationTestRunner.onStart(InstrumentationTestRunner.java:520) W/ApplicationContext(): at android.app.Instrumentation$InstrumentationThread.run(Instrumentation.java:1447)
and apparently the preferences are cleared when the exception is thrown (bad bad bad)
So my questions are : is indeed the behavior as I state it (or have I missed something silly) ? What is the motivation behind it (especially the null values behavior) ? Is it documented and guaranteed to stay so - or may change ? Is point 2 an oversight ?
Test project.
回答1:
It's in the code
It's me not understanding generics:
You can easily put a String into a HashSet<Integer> by using the raw type HashSet
Posted an issue here: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=63463 (after starting a discussion in google groups with the usual noop results). Actually as of 2014.01.07 the issue is marked Future Release :)
Test project.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19610569/android-sharedpreferences-null-keys-values-and-sets-corner-cases