try-catch

WWW::Mechanize::Timed https timeout does not work

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-12-06 07:18:08
问题 So I've researched to the ends of the internet (at least I think so) about this issue. I'm trying to set an alarm timeout of 60 seconds for a get() but it does not get caught and will run past 60 seconds, also any time the default timeout (180 sec) is reached for the www::mechanized::timed constructor, I get the error below: Use of uninitialized value in addition (+) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/WWW/Mechanize/Timed.pm line 52. code: use WWW::Mechanize::Timed; use HTTP::Cookies; use Try:

Will MessageBox.Show cause the timeout issue on server side?

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-06 07:04:43
I have a scheduled SSIS package with a script task in SQL Server Agent on our server. I did set the timeout for the SQL connection, and for some of the codes inside the Try block, it will throw the error, and there is MessageBox.Show inside the Catch block. If I leave the codes as they are, it will fail the job, but if I comment out those MessageBox.Show and leave the Catch block blank just for testing purpose, the job ran successfully. Anybody knows that the MessageBox.Show will affect the timeout for connection on server side or what exactly cause this different result after disable showing

twilio catching error does not work

岁酱吖の 提交于 2019-12-06 06:25:24
I am implementing twilio in my laravel 5 application. To use it in the framework I use aloha/laravel-twilio integration. Sending a valid request with test-credentials works fine. I have problems when I want to implement an error-handling . For some reason the catch does not get the error, which results in a crash of the app. The error seems to be in the twilio-sdk if I read the error message correctly. Here is what I've done so far: <?php namespace App; use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model; use Aloha\Twilio\TwilioInterface; class Activation extends Model { protected $fillable = array( 'a',

ASM Try/Catch Block with an output value

北城余情 提交于 2019-12-06 06:13:41
I am currently trying make my custom compiler allow using try/catch as an expression, i.e. leaving a value on the stack. The type checker and the backend already support this, but the problem seems to be ASM's COMPUTE_FRAMES . With the below code for instrumentation: private void write(MethodWriter writer, boolean expression) { org.objectweb.asm.Label tryStart = new org.objectweb.asm.Label(); org.objectweb.asm.Label tryEnd = new org.objectweb.asm.Label(); org.objectweb.asm.Label endLabel = new org.objectweb.asm.Label(); boolean hasFinally = this.finallyBlock != null; writer.writeLabel(tryStart

Scala Continuations - Why can't my shifted call be inside a try-catch block?

╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2019-12-06 05:06:26
问题 I'm new to Scala continuations, and relatively new to the scala language in general. I tried playing with Scala continuations and wrote the following code: case class MyException(msg:String) extends Exception def go:Int = reset { println("enter your input") val my_check = //try { val user_input = readLine() if (!user_input.matches("\\w+")) { throw new MyException("illegal string: " + user_input) } shift { k: (Boolean => Int) => { if (user_input == "true") { k(true) } else if (user_input ==

Long try statements

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-06 05:05:09
问题 Is there any drawback to putting most of your code for your function in a try statement . If I do something that requires a try statement , I usually end up doing a lot of work for that function inside the try statement because I usually declare my variables in there and can't use them outside that scope if I do that. Is this common and accepted? Do people usually declare variable before without initializing them so they're not doing everything (including calls to other functions) inside a

R Log warnings and continue execution

余生长醉 提交于 2019-12-06 04:42:12
问题 I have a block of R code that is wrapped in a tryCatch statement. Any of the lines in that block can potentially throw a warning or an error. When caught, I have handlers for both warnings and errors, which perform logging in both cases, and exit handling in the error case. But in the warning case, I just want the warning to be logged, and the execution to continue as normal. At the moment, when warning is caught, it is logged, but the execution is also stopped. Is there an easy way to allow

How do I throw a custom try-catch exception on CakePHP?

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-12-06 04:22:19
I want to throw a custom exception which is the data validation exception in a controller of my CakePHP application. How do I create my own custom exception handler in Cakephp so that I can throw the exception and catch the exception? My code example: function getUserDetails($userid){ try{ if(!$validUser){ throw new Exception('Invalid User'); } return $userDetailsData; //returned from db }catch(Exception $e){ echo 'Error:'.$e->getMessage(); return; } } is it possible to use here custom Exception class in cakephp so that only those exception can be thrown that what i do. Hope it clarifies

Is there a better way to get visual studio to ignore try/catch in debug mode

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-06 03:41:40
问题 I want the designer to catch the error when I am debugging and I want the user to see my friendly message if an error occurs for them. I know I can acomplish this with the following: #If Debug=False Then Try #End If 'some code here #If Debug=False Then Catch ex as exception Messagebox.Show("Errors suck") End Try #End If I do not want to have to write all the #statements and having them cluttering up my code. It seems like this should be a common need and there has to be a better way. Does

new jre7 try block resources

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-12-06 03:37:11
If I do something like try ( Connection conn = Database.getConnection(); PreparedStatement ps = conn.prepareStatement("SELECT * FROM table WHERE something = ? LIMIT 1"); ) { ps.setString(1, "hello world"); ResultSet results = ps.executeQuery(); if(results.next()) { // blah } } catch(SQLException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } Will the ResultSet still be closed when the PreparedStatement is closed, or will I still have to explicitly close the ResultSet also? As per javax.sql.Statement.close() method's JavaDoc: Note:When a Statement object is closed, its current ResultSet object, if one exists, is