semweb

How can ROWLEX be licensed under L-GPL while it uses SemWeb which is GPL? [closed]

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-10 06:31:41
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . According to its homepage, the SemWeb library (great library for handling RDF under .NET) is released under GPL. Since the ROWLEX tool is built on SemWeb, ROWLEX supposed to be GPL, too. Still, ROWLEX is claimed to be released under L-GPL. Is this legally correct? 回答1: Actually, your statement is not completely

How can ROWLEX be licensed under L-GPL while it uses SemWeb which is GPL? [closed]

久未见 提交于 2019-12-05 14:38:19
Closed. This question is off-topic . It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 4 years ago . According to its homepage, the SemWeb library (great library for handling RDF under .NET) is released under GPL. Since the ROWLEX tool is built on SemWeb, ROWLEX supposed to be GPL, too. Still, ROWLEX is claimed to be released under L-GPL. Is this legally correct? Actually, your statement is not completely accurate. SemWeb is not just GPL but dual-licensed. The source code written by Joshua Tauberer is also