latex

When editing non-WYSIWYG (LaTeX, HTML, etc) prose you probably want to have newlines at the ends of your sentences. This has several advantages: Easier to rearrange sentences. Easier to comment out sentences. Easier to spot run-on / overly long sentences. Easier to comment on sentences. For example: % The following isn't strictly true; maybe excise or comment out for now: After all, people who use Word or other WYSIWYG editors are aiding and abetting terrorists. And probably the most important advantage of all is that it makes collaborative editing under version control much easier. Otherwise

Is there any obvious or pretty way to have LaTeX automatically put a \hline between each line in a table without having to put a \hline between each line? I thought about creating a command like: \newcommand{\EOL}{\\ \hline} But then I will get non-standard looking tables like this: 3 & 2 & 1 \EOL 1 & 2 & 3 \EOL Is there a way such that my table bodies could look like: 3 & 2 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 & 3 \\ And yet still get the hlines? \catcode`@=11 \let \savecr \@tabularcr \def\@tabularcr{\savecr\hline} \catcode`@=12 \begin{tabular}{ccc} 1 & 2 & 3\\ 4 & 5 & 6\\ \end{tabular} 来源： https://stackoverflow.com

I wanted to map <C-j> to switch to the next window below the current one map <C-j> <C-w>j However, it goes into Insert mode instead of moving the window below. Why? Solution attempted: I have latex-suite installed. So I tried to query what <C-j> is mapped to :map <C-j> And I get the following output: v <NL> <Plug>IMAP_JumpForward n <NL> <Plug>IMAP_JumpForward o <NL> <C-W>j This means that I should change the mapping of <Plug>IMAP_JumpForward . I read around a bit and I found out it's related to the <++> placeholders that you can jump to using <C-j> during Insert mode. So, based on my reading,

I start by defining a command to store the string "Hello": \newcommand{\textstring}{Hello} I would like to append the string " world" but unfortunately this code causes an error: \renewcommand{\textstring}{\textstring world} You can accomplish this by using \expandafter . For example: % redefine \textstring by appending " world" to it \expandafter\def\expandafter\textstring\expandafter{\textstring { }world} If you don't use \expandafter then you end up with a recursion problem. You can read more about it here . The problem is that this overwrites the definition of \textstring , rather than

EDIT : As I see in the first answer, underline is the wrong word. I want a line under the section heading, separating the heading from the following text. I want to separate section headings from the following text with a horizontal line. At the moment I use the following: \newcommand{\tmpsection}[1]{} \let\tmpsection=\section \renewcommand{\section}[1]{\tmpsection{#1}\hrule\nobreak} But that produces a line, that is too far away from the section-heading and to near to the following text. Has anyone a better idea? You can do this with the \sectionrule command in the sectsty package . Rewriting

When I generate a .pdf file from a .tex file using pdflatex , only the "Contents" title is shown with no actual TOC. If I run pdflatex my.tex once more, it generates the TOC just fine. I can reproduce this simply by removing the .toc file. What I think is happening is that my .toc file is being generated too late -- so how can I make the TOC work first time? Should I be generating the TOC beforehand without using pdflatex ? This is normal. LaTeX document need several compilations to reach a stable state. Use rubber -d my to compile the right number of times ( rubber comes as a package on many