branch

分组 case when 1 select distinct a.Branch, case when kultur = '硕士' then sum(num) else '0' end as 研究生学历, case when kultur = '本科' then sum(num) else '0' end as 大本学历, case when kultur = '大专' then sum(num) else '0' end as 大专学历, case when kultur = '中专' then sum(num) else '0' end as 中专学历, case when kultur = '高中' or kultur ='职高' or kultur ='中职' then sum(num) else '0' end as 高中学历, case when kultur = '初中' then sum(num) else '0' end as 初中学历, case when kultur = '小学' then sum(num) else '0' end as 小学学历, case when kultur = '' or kultur is null then sum(num) else '0' end as 未填写学历 from( select Branch,kultur

I have a few contributors in my github project. I want to allow only one of them to "push" to master. And this guy is not me (the owner of the repository). Is it possible to do? Back then, when this question was posted, GitHub didn't allow you to specify access privileges on a branch level. You can only do it on a repository level. So what you are requesting wasn't possible. If you want to work around this limitation, I personally see two options: you could use some kind of commit hooks, etc. to at least inform someone that something wrong happened If you really need this tight control, you

作者：丁哥开讲 链接：https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/75499871 来源：知乎 著作权归作者所有。商业转载请联系作者获得授权，非商业转载请注明出处。 git merge和git rebase的区别, 切记：永远用rebase ​ 这一期来谈一下git merge和git rebase的区别。 Git无疑现在已经成为最流行的代码管理工具之一。其中有两个命令，对很多程序员造成了很多的困惑，一个是merge，一个是rebase。 这些困惑主要纠结于到底应该用merge还是用rebase。 在继续深入探讨之前，我先抛出我的观点。如果你想拥有一套稳定的，健壮的代码, 永远要使用rebase。 不为别的，就为了rebase可以给你提供一套清晰的代码历史。 相反的, merge会给你一套乱七八糟的代码历史。当你看到这样的代码历史的时候，我相信你绝对没有心情去研究每一个历史对应的代码。 好，接下来我们就详细分析一下这两个命令的作用。假设我们的repo有这么个主branch: master。 每个程序员在创建自己的代码之前，要首先创建自己的个人分支，然后代码修改开始。 假如你有6个程序员一起工作， 你就会有6个程序员的分支， 如果你使用merge, 你的代码历史树就会有六个branch跟这个主的branch交织在一起。 那个画风我相信对你一定很熟悉

I have a parameterized Jenkins job which requires the input of a specific Git branch in a specific Git repo. Currently this parameter is a string parameter. Is there any way to make this parameter a choice parameter and dynamically fill the drop down list with the Git branches? I don't want to require someone to maintain this choice parameter by manually configuring the drop down every time a new branch is created. Extended Choice Parameter plugin will allow you to read the choices from a file. Of course, now you have another problem: how to make sure the file is up-to-date (that can be done

The company I work for is starting to have issues with their current branching model and I was wondering what different kinds of branching strategies the community has been exposed to? Are there any good ones for different situations? What does your company use? What are the advantages and disadvantages of them?? Here is the method I've used in the past with good success: /trunk - bleeding edge. Next major release of the code. May or may not work at any given time. /branches/1.0, 1.1, etc. Stable maintenance branches of the code. Used to fix bugs, stabilize new releases. If a maintenance

I understand the scenario presented in Pro Git about the risks of git rebase . The author basically tells you how to avoid duplicated commits: Do not rebase commits that you have pushed to a public repository. I am going to tell you my particular situation because I think it does not exactly fit the Pro Git scenario and I still end up with duplicated commits. Let's say I have two remote branches with their local counterparts: origin/master origin/dev | | master dev All four branches contains the same commits and I am going to start development in dev : origin/master : C1 C2 C3 C4 master : C1

We are using a git repository to store our project. We have our branches departing from the original branch. But now we want to create a small new project to track some documentation. For that we would want to create a new empty branch to start storing our files, and I would want other users of the network to clone that branch. How can we do that? I tried some things, but they didnt work. $ mkdir proj_doc; cd proj_doc $ git init $ git add . $ git commit -m 'first commit' $ git br proj_doc $ git co proj_doc $ git br -d master $ git push origin proj_doc It seems to push the branch ok, but when I