branch

Git-查看远程分支、本地分支、创建分支 1.查看本地分支 $ git branch * br-2.1.2.2 master 2.查看远程分支 $ git branch -r origin/HEAD -> origin/master origin/feature/IOS_visualtrack origin/feature/android_visualtrack origin/master 3.查看所有分支 $ git branch -a * br-2.1.2.2 master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/br-2.1.2.1 remotes/origin/br-2.1.2.2 remotes/origin/br-2.1.3 remotes/origin/master 4.切换远程分支 $ git branch -a * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/Release remotes/origin/master $ git checkout -b myRelease origin/Release Branch myRelease set up to track remote branch Release from

Please note : I'm not trying to restart the argument whether Mercurial or Git is better, I just have a technical question that I, as a Mercurial user, don't understand. I'm also not sure whether SO is the right place to ask such a question, but it is programming related. There have been many discussions about how the two version control systems Git and Mercurial differ from each other from a user's point of view (e.g. What is the Difference Between Mercurial and Git? and http://felipec.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/mercurial-vs-git-its-all-in-the-branches/ ), and the major difference is the

Git常用命令 git stash //将当前分支修改隐藏 git stash list //查看隐藏的修改 git stash apply //恢复隐藏的修改，需git stash drop手动删除隐藏 git stash pop //恢复隐藏的修改，自动删除 git branch //查看本地分支 git branch -r //查看远程分支 git branch -a //查看所有分支 git branch <name> //创建分支 git checkout <name> //切换分支 git checkout -b <name> //创建并切换分支 git merge <name> //合并某分支到当前分支 git branch -d <name> //删除分支 git branch -D <name> //强制删除分支 git pull //从远程抓取分支，如果有冲突，要先处理冲突。 git remote add 仓库地址 //添加远程仓库 git push -u origin master //提交本地代码到远程仓库master分支 git push origin <branch-name> //推送当前分支到远程分支。 git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/remote_branch your_branch /

I created a new Branch before I started dev on something experimental. I usually forget that (which isn't a problem), but now I did it beforehand. Since then I have updated 3 files. In 2 are only experimental changes that I DON'T want committed to the safe branch. In 1 are only safe (minor) changes that I definitely DO want committed to the safe branch. I'm fine with these last changes to be committed to the new branch as well (but rather not). Is it possible - I'm sure it is - to (quickly) commit a few unstaged, uncommitted changes from my (dirty) working dir to an old, safe branch? The only

I am working on a project, and had all of my tests passing on the master branch. I then made some changes, and when everything started failing, I realized that maybe I should have made those changes on a different branch. Is there a way I can commit the changes to a new branch without committing them to my master branch, so that the master still has my passing tests? Yes, just create the new branch and check it out: $ git checkout -b new-branch Then commit any changes you have. They'll be applied to the new, checked-out branch. You can stash your current changes (git stash), switch to the new

I'm using git, and I'm setting up the following branches to support my workflow: release, which only contains released software, testing, which contains software released to the testing group, develop, which is where development happens, some_topic_branch, where features, etc. get added. Topic branches branch from and get merged into develop. When we're ready for a testing release, testing merges in develop. When a testing release is approved for production, release merges in testing. This is all easy enough to set up, but I'm wondering about the enforcement options in git. For example, is it

How can I get the current branch or tag name for my working copy? I have seen references that indicate rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD will give branch name, but this doesn't work if the checkout is of a tag, in which case it just returns 'HEAD'. I need to somehow get the tag name of these revisions. To be clear, I want one of two possible names: If the current checkout is the HEAD of a branch, I want the branch name If it is a detached HEAD, I want the tag name (on the assumption there is a tag) I think you want this: git symbolic-ref -q --short HEAD || git describe --tags --exact-match That will

I'm currently reorganising our TFS source control for a very large set of solutions, and I've done this successfully so far. I have a problem at the moment where I need to delete a legacy "Release Branch" TFS project that was branched for the old structure, and is no-longer required since I now host a release branch within the new structure. This is an example of how the source control now looks after moving everything: $/Source Project /Trunk /[Projects] /Release /[Projects] $/Release Branch Project /[Projects] /[Other legacy stuff] So far I've found information that says: tf delete /lock

Git 2.x 中git push时遇到 push.default 警告的解决方法 0.0382016.02.18 20:23:34字数 389阅读 12061 最近在学习使用 git&GitHub，然后今天遇到了一个问题。在执行 git add 和 git commit 操作之后，再进行 git push 操作，出现了如下提示： $ git push warning: push.default is unset; its implicit value has changed in Git 2.0 from 'matching' to 'simple'. To squelch this message and maintain the traditional behavior, use: git config --global push.default matching To squelch this message and adopt the new behavior now, use: git config --global push.default simple When push.default is set to 'matching', git will push local branches to the remote branches that already