I have someting like this
class A:
__a = 0
def __init__(self):
A.__a = A.__a + 1
def a(self):
return A.__a
class B(A):
def __init__(self):
So, __a isn't a static variable, it's a class variable. And because of the double leading underscore, it's a name mangled variable. That is, to make it pseudo-private, it's been automagically renamed to _<classname>__<variablename> instead of __<variablename>. It can still be accessed by instances of that class only as __<variablename>, subclasses don't get this special treatment.
I would recommend that you not use the double leading underscore, just a single underscore to (a) mark that it is private, and (b) to avoid the name mangling.
Refer to it as A._A__a. In Python, symbols with a __ prefix occurring inside a class definition are prefixed with _<class-name> to make them somewhat "private". Thus the reference A.__a that appears in the definition of B is, counterintuitively, a reference to A._B__a:
>>> class Foo(object): _Bar__a = 42
...
>>> class Bar(object): a = Foo.__a
...
>>> Bar.a
42
There are Python decorators @staticmethod and @classmethod, which you can use to declare a method static or class-related. This should help accessing your class data element:
class MyClass:
__a = 0
@staticmethod
def getA():
return MyClass.__a
class MyOtherClass:
def DoSomething(self):
print MyClass.getA() + 1
Example inspired by this source: http://www.rexx.com/~dkuhlman/python_101/python_101.html