I have this small gridComponent:
@Component({
selector: \'moving-grid\',
templateUrl: \'./grid.component.html\',
styleUrls: [\'./grid.component.c
You should not use an @Input
to pass in the components. You can use @ContentChildren for that and an abstract WidgetComponent
:
@Component({
selector: 'moving-grid',
template: `
<div class="widget-wrapper">
<ng-container *ngFor="let widget of widgets">
<!-- use a ngSwitchCase here for different types-->
<grid-test-widget [widget]="widget" *ngIf="widget.active && widget.type === 'test'"></grid-widget>
</ng-container>
</div>
`,
styleUrls: ['./grid.component.css']
})
export class GridComponent implements AfterContentInit {
@ContentChildren('widget') widgets: WidgetComponent[];
ngAfterContentInit() {
//your components will be available here
}
}
The template of your third component will stay the same, but without the [widgets]
and an added #widget
name:
<moving-grid>
<test-widget class="grid-item-content-001" #widget [active]="false"></test>
<test-widget class="grid-item-content-002" #widget></test>
</moving-grid>
Your TestWidgetComponent
which will extend an abstract WidgetComponent :
@Directive({
selector: 'test-widget'
})
export class TestWidgetComponent extends WidgetComponent {
public type: string = 'test';
}
And your WidgetComponent
:
@Injectable()
export class WidgetComponent {
@Input()
public active: boolean;
public type: string;
}
And you'll have several grid widgets based on the type of the widget:
@Component({
selector: 'grid-test-widget',
template: `<div #content>I say hello<li>i</li><li>u</li><button (click)="test()">click me</button> world</div>`
})
export class GridTestWidgetComponent{}