I\'m brand new to Erlang. How do you do modulo (get the remainder of a division)? It\'s % in most C-like languages, but that designates a comment in Erlang.
Several
According to this blog post, it's rem
.
In Erlang, 5 rem 3.
gives 2
, and -5 rem 3.
gives -2
. If I understand your question, you would want -5 rem 3.
to give 1 instead, since -5 = -2 * 3 + 1.
Does this do what you want?
mod(X,Y) when X > 0 -> X rem Y;
mod(X,Y) when X < 0 -> Y + X rem Y;
mod(0,Y) -> 0.
mod(A, B) when A > 0 -> A rem B;
mod(A, B) when A < 0 -> mod(A+B, B);
mod(0, _) -> 0.
% console:
3> my:mod(-13, 5).
2
The erlang modulo operator is rem
Eshell V5.6.4 (abort with ^G)
1> 97 rem 10.
7
I used the following in elixir:
defp mod(x,y) when x > 0, do: rem(x, y);
defp mod(x,y) when x < 0, do: rem(x, y) + y;
defp mod(0,_y), do: 0
Please don't downvote this because it's another language than the question. We all live the dream, because we all have the beam.
The above Y + X rem Y seems to be wrong: either (Y + X) rem Y or Y + (X rem Y) yield incorrect results. Ex: let Y=3. If X=-4, the first form returns -1, if X=-3 the second form returns 3, none of which is in [0;3[.
I use this instead:
% Returns the positive remainder of the division of X by Y, in [0;Y[.
% In Erlang, -5 rem 3 is -2, whereas this function will return 1,
% since -5 =-2 * 3 + 1.
modulo(X,Y) when X > 0 ->
X rem Y;
modulo(X,Y) when X < 0 ->
K = (-X div Y)+1,
PositiveX = X + K*Y,
PositiveX rem Y;
modulo(0,_Y) ->
0.