Missing parentheses with Regex

后端 未结 4 939
轮回少年
轮回少年 2020-12-29 14:21

Am I correct in thinking that Regex can\'t be used to detect missing parentheses (because there is no way of counting pairs)? Using JavaScript I\'ve about a thousand strings

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-12-29 15:01

    Some regex flavors are able to match recursive structures like nested parentheses, but the syntax is so complicated, it's usually easier just to write a function. JavaScript regexes don't support recursion at all.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-29 15:11
    function isFine(str) {  
      return /[(){}\[\]]/.test( str ) && 
        ( str.match( /\(/g ) || '' ).length == ( str.match( /\)/g ) || '' ).length &&
        ( str.match( /\[/g ) || '' ).length == ( str.match( /]/g ) || '' ).length &&
        ( str.match( /{/g ) || '' ).length == ( str.match( /}/g ) || '' ).length;
    }
    

    Test

    isFine('(this is fine and does not need attention)');                 // true
    isFine('This is also [fine]');                                        // true
    isFine('This is bad( and needs to be edited');                        // false
    isFine('This [is (also) bad');                                        // false
    isFine('as is this} bad');                                            // false
    isFine('this string has no brackets but must also be considered');    // false
    

    Note though, that this doesn't check bracket order, i.e. a)b(c would be deemed fine.

    For the record, here is a function that checks for missing brackets and checks that each type is correctly balanced. It doesn't allow a)b(c, but it does allow (a[bc)d] as each type is checked individually.

    function checkBrackets( str ) {
        var lb, rb, li, ri,
            i = 0,
            brkts = [ '(', ')', '{', '}', '[', ']' ];   
        while ( lb = brkts[ i++ ], rb = brkts[ i++ ] ) { 
            li = ri = 0;
            while ( li = str.indexOf( lb, li ) + 1 ) {
                if ( ( ri = str.indexOf( rb, ri ) + 1 ) < li ) {
                    return false;
                }
            }
            if ( str.indexOf( rb, ri ) + 1 ) {
                return false;
            } 
        }
        return true;
    }
    

    Finally, further to Christophe's post, here is what seems the best solution to checking for missing brackets and checking that all are correctly balanced and nested:

    function checkBrackets( str ) {
        var s;
        str = str.replace( /[^{}[\]()]/g, '' );
        while ( s != str ) { 
            s = str;
            str = str.replace( /{}|\[]|\(\)/g, '' )
        }
        return !str;
    };
    
    checkBrackets( 'ab)cd(efg' );        // false   
    checkBrackets( '((a)[{{b}}]c)' );    // true   
    checkBrackets( 'ab[cd]efg' );        // true   
    checkBrackets( 'a(b[c)d]e' );        // false   
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-29 15:14

    It's possible to use recursive regex to verify matching parentheses. For example, in Perl, the following expression matches strings with proper () {} [] nesting:

    $r = qr/(?:(?>[^(){}\[\]]+)|\((??{$r})\)|\{(??{$r})\}|\[(??{$r})\])*/;
    

    Here is the same expression expanded for clarity:

    $r = qr/
        (?:
            (?>
                [^(){}\[\]]+
            )
        |
            \(
                (??{$r})
            \)
        |
            \{
                (??{$r})
            \}
        |
            \[
                (??{$r})
            \]
        )*
    /x;
    

    The outer group is quantified with * instead of + so as to match empty strings, so in order to make $r useful, the actual matching must be done with an expression that utilizes lookaheads/lookbehinds or otherwise establishes context, e.g. /^$r$/. For example, the following prints only the lines in a file that do not have proper nesting:

    perl -ne '$r = qr/(?:(?>[^(){}\[\]]+)|\((??{$r})\)|\{(??{$r})\}|\[(??{$r})\])*/; print if !m/^$r$/' file
    

    To address your clarification: If these are filenames and not file contents, you could pipe the output of ls or find or whatever into the above command, sans file:

    ls | perl -ne '$r = qr/(?:(?>[^(){}\[\]]+)|\((??{$r})\)|\{(??{$r})\}|\[(??{$r})\])*/; print if !m/^$r$/'
    

    However, as others have said, a non-regex solution is probably better in general.

    N.B. From the Perl doc: "WARNING: This extended regular expression feature is considered experimental, and may be changed without notice. Code executed that has side effects may not perform identically from version to version due to the effect of future optimisations in the regex engine."

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-29 15:17

    You can't do the recursion in the regex itself, but you can always do it in JavaScript.

    Here is an example:

    // First remove non-brackets:
    string=string.replace(/[^{}[\]()]/g,"");
    // Then remove bracket pairs recursively
    while (string!==oldstring) {
      oldstring=string;
      string=string.replace(/({}|\[\]|\(\))/g,"");
    }
    

    The remainder are the non-matching brackets.

    Live demo: http://jsfiddle.net/3Njzv/

    If you need to count the pairs, you can do the replacements one at a time and add a counter:

    // First remove non-brackets:
    string=string.replace(/[^{}[\]()]/g,"");
    
    // Then remove bracket pairs recursively
    var counter=-1;
    while (string!==oldstring) {
      counter ++;
      oldstring=string;
      string=string.replace(/({}|\[\]|\(\))/,"");
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题