JPA table with 2 primary key fields

Question

I have a table which contains only 2 fields. The table has a composite PK formed by these two fields.

When using Netbeans for creating entity beans from database, th

Answer 1

Thanks @XaviLópez. Your explanation fixed my code which was declared as its own IdClass mentioned by @Tom Anderson. When I declared as its own IdClass having 2 @Id columns, a JPA query fetching a list of that entity was returning expected "n" items in the result list but each item in that list is null. But that size "n" is expected. After changing to static inner class which is less of refactoring, its able to return right set of result.

According to me: self referencing IdClass wont work because, the self is already an entity and that needs to be in Persistence Context. If I also have a primary key object of the same type, then there will be two "identical" objects in the persistence context. So, it should not be allowed. Hence, we should not use self referencing @IdClass. Create a static inner class as primary key type which is less intrusive.

Answer 2

I don't use NetBeans so I can't really say anything about its mapping tools.

For mapping a composite key, there are a couple of options. You can

• Define a separate @Embeddable object with the PK fields and use it as @EmbeddedId in your @Entity class

  @Embeddable
  public class MyCompositePK { 
      @Column
      private String fieldA;
      @Column
      private String fieldB;
  }
  @Entity 
  public class MyBean { 
      @EmbeddedId
      private MyCompositePK id;
      @Column
      private String fieldC;
  }
  

• Define a non-mapped POJO with the PK fields and use it as @IdClass in the @Entity.

  @Entity
  @IdClass(value=ClassAB.ClassABId.class)
  public class ClassAB implements Serializable {
      private String idA;
      private String idB;
  
      @Id
      @Column(name="ID_A")
      public String getIdA(){ return idA; }
      public void setIdA(String idA){ this.idA = idA; }
  
      @Id
      @Column(name="ID_B")
      public String getIdB(){ return idB; }
      public void setIdB(String idB){ this.idB = idB; }
  
      static class ClassABId implements Serializable {
          private String idA;
          private String idB;
  
          public String getIdA(){ return idA; }
          public void setIdA(String idA){ this.idA = idA; }
  
          public String getIdB(){ return idB; }
          public void setIdB(String idB){ this.idB = idB; }
  
          // implement equals(), hashcode()
      }
  }
  

  In this example ClassABId is a static inner class just for convenience.

These options are also explained in Pascal Thivent's excellent answer to this question: How to map a composite key with Hibernate?.

This related question discusses differences between these approaches: Which anotation should I use: @IdClass or @EmbeddedId. Notice the fields' declaration gets duplicated with the @IdClass approach.

Anyhow, I don't think there's an alternative to creating two classes. That's why I asked this question : Mapping a class that consists only of a composite PK without @IdClass or @EmbeddedId. It seems there's an hibernate-specific feature for this.

As a side note, if you've got control over the DB structure, you might also consider avoiding composite keys. There are some reasons to do so.