I created a program using Hibernate.
The program reaches the main function end, nevertheless the program is running.
I wonder if it happens when Sessio
i had the same problem, the solution is so simple , you have to add this property to configuration's file
<property name="hibernate.c3p0.timeout">0</property>
Same problem in 4.3.4.Final.
Now after adding following code, the problem is gone.
public class Service {
private SessionFactory factory;
private ServiceRegistry serviceRegistry;
public void initialize() throws Exception{
Configuration configuration = new Configuration();
configuration.configure("com/jeecourse/config/hibernate.cfg.xml");
serviceRegistry = new StandardServiceRegistryBuilder().applySettings(
configuration.getProperties()).build();
factory = configuration.buildSessionFactory(serviceRegistry);
}
public void close() throws Exception{
if(serviceRegistry!= null) {
StandardServiceRegistryBuilder.destroy(serviceRegistry);
}
}
.....
I faced the same issue, the reason is we need to close the resources properly. try closing the resources in finally block
try{
Configuration cfg = new Configuration().configure("hibernate.cfg.xml");
sessionFactory = cfg.buildSessionFactory();;
session = sessionFactory.openSession();
transaction = session.beginTransaction();
session.save(person);
transaction.commit();
}catch(Exception e){
System.out.println("Exception occured. "+e.getMessage());
}finally{
if(session.isOpen()){
System.out.println("Closing session");
session.close();
}
if(!sessionFactory.isClosed()){
System.out.println("Closing SessionFactory");
sessionFactory.close();
}
}
maybe, I solved this problem.
I saw the thread dump after Util.getSessionFactory().close() called, a thread named "pool-2-thread-1" state was TIMED_WAITING (parking).
The following snippets dump
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (25.0-b69 mixed mode):
"DestroyJavaVM" #16 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00000000020b9000 nid=0x3684 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000]
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
"pool-2-thread-1" #15 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x000000001bc27000 nid=0x3f0 waiting on condition [0x000000001ce6f000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x0000000080be30a0> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
"derby.rawStoreDaemon" #14 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x000000001b059000 nid=0xa3c in Object.wait() [0x000000001ba1f000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0x00000000805f6190> (a org.apache.derby.impl.services.daemon.BasicDaemon)
at org.apache.derby.impl.services.daemon.BasicDaemon.rest(Unknown Source)
- locked <0x00000000805f6190> (a org.apache.derby.impl.services.daemon.BasicDaemon)
at org.apache.derby.impl.services.daemon.BasicDaemon.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
"Timer-0" #13 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x000000001b08e800 nid=0x2160 in Object.wait() [0x000000001b6af000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0x0000000080608118> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:526)
- locked <0x0000000080608118> (a java.util.TaskQueue)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505)
I thought the cause is thread named "pool-2-thread-1" that created by buildSessionFactory method.
As a result of comparing the two buildSessionFactory method, I noticed that ServiceRegistry resources has not released.
Program successfully terminated by releasing it.
The following code, I adding.
Util.java
configuration.setSessionFactoryObserver(
new SessionFactoryObserver() {
@Override
public void sessionFactoryCreated(SessionFactory factory) {}
@Override
public void sessionFactoryClosed(SessionFactory factory) {
((StandardServiceRegistryImpl) serviceRegistry).destroy();
}
}
);
thanks.
It seems that Hibernate 4.3.1 introduced a bug. I create the connection in my application with:
EntityManagerFactory connection = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(...)
but even if the createEntityManagerFactory
method fails with an exception, the service registry remains open. However, as you could see from the above code, I cannot terminate my application because as the method didn't succeed the variable connection
wasn't assigned (it is null), so I cannot call connection.close()
that would destroy the service registry. It seems that this is really a bug, because how will I be able to release resources without resorting to a hack, like using specific Hibernate APIs from a JPA application?
I met this problem also today, and I found that the solution like:
sessionFactory.close();
will work if you have
<property name="connection.pool_size">1</property>