Usually, we can set a parent element to be the context for a child\'s absolute
positioning, as follows:
A table-cell
is meant to be inside a table
, so:
See this working Fiddle!
div {
display: table; /* this line */
line-height: 28px;
padding: 0 20px;
background: #ffffd;
position: relative;
}
Note:
Since you don't have a table
in there, set it.
You can see this quirksmode for the The display declaration.
From the W3C recommendation :: Tables it reads
The computed values of properties 'position', 'float', 'margin-*', 'top', 'right', 'bottom', and 'left' on the table element are used on the table wrapper box and not the table box; all other values of non-inheritable properties are used on the table box and not the table wrapper box. (Where the table element's values are not used on the table and table wrapper boxes, the initial values are used instead.)
This is not a bug, is more like a status-bydesign thing! Please see this!
To include the work around placed on the comment as requested on the question:
So,
is this a bug? If so,is there anyway to work around it?
Possible work around are:
Wrap the element with a div
as position:relative;
See Fiddle!
#wrapper {
position: relative;
}
Note: most practical solution!
Wrap the inner elements with a div
as position:relative;
See Fiddle!
#innerWrapper {
position: relative;
}
Note: requires some definitions from the original element to be declared on the innerWrapper!