I\'m trying to write some Haskell code in which there are multiple data types, each of which can have multiple implementations. To do this, I define each data type as a
There's no really good way to do this; the best practice is to define some constants like
plusA, minusA :: (A a, Num x) => a x -> a x -> a x
which makes writing the Num
instances more mechanical after you have an A
instance:
instance A Foo where ...
instance Num x => Num (Foo x) where
(+) = plusA
(-) = minusA
This part of your question
I suppose that the 'duplicate instance declarations' message is because a data type could be made an instance of both A and B. I want to be able to make a promise to the compiler that I won't do that, or possibly specify a default class to use in the case that a type is an instance of both classes.
is incorrect. It's actually because you've written two instances,
instance Num (a x)
instance Num (b x)
that the compiler can't tell apart (see the link from @hammar's comment, class contexts don't count for the purpose of differentiating between instance declarations).
One solution is to add a witness type.
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances, FlexibleContexts, UndecidableInstances, OverlappingInstances #-}
data AWitness
data AImpl witness x = AImpl x deriving (Eq,Show)
instance A (AImpl AWitness) where
fa (AImpl x) = x
ga x = AImpl x
instance (A (a AWitness), Num x, Show (a AWitness x), Eq (a AWitness x)) => Num (a AWitness x) where
a1 + a2 = ga (fa a1 + fa a2)
The compiler can use the witness types to differentiate between your instance declarations.