JSLint is complaining that (true) is a weird condition. Which is understandable if I wasn\'t using it on a reversed switch statement. So is JSLint
numberOfColumns = Math.max(4, Math.floor(menuLinksLength / 3));
This will give you identical results to your existing code. Your question is fairly ambiguous, as "acceptable" is a very subjective term. I would personally reject any merge request with a reversed switch statement, because I actually can't think of a situation where that couldn't be replaced with something simpler and/or easier to read.
The third edition of the ECMA-262 standard (supported by Firefox 1.0+, Google Chrome 1.0+, MSIE 5.5+ and others) defines that
switch (expression) {
case label1:
statements1
.
.
.
}
executes statements1 if (expression) matches label1.
That means that your switch statement is perfectly fine.
I tried it out on Firefox, Chrome and IE. None complains...
Edit:
Now the guessing part:
JSLint is a code anaylisis tool. When it sees switch (true), it assumes that you don't know what you're doing. Weird doesn't mean necessarily wrong...
Personally I wouldn't like seeing reversed switch in a code base. It doesn't buy you anything when compared to a plain if/elseif block, and its exotic nature can be cause for confusion.
That's also what JSLint is complaining about:
You are doing something unorthodox. Is there a good reason for it? If not, it might be better to stick to the basics.