I need to efficiently calculate the euclidean weighted distances for every x,y
point in a given array to every other x,y
point in another
You could use cdist
if you don't need weighted distances. If you need weighted distances and performance, create an array of the appropriate output size, and use either an automated accelerator like Numba or Parakeet, or hand-tune the code with Cython.
You can avoid looping by using code that looks like the following:
def compute_distances(A, B, W):
Ax = A[:,0].reshape(1, A.shape[0])
Bx = B[:,0].reshape(A.shape[0], 1)
dx = Bx-Ax
# Same for dy
dist = np.sqrt(dx**2 + dy**2) * W
return dist
That will run a lot faster in python that anything that loops as long as you have enough memory for the arrays.
@Evan and @Martinis Group are on the right track - to expand on Evan's answer, here's a function that uses broadcasting to quickly calculate the n-dimensional weighted euclidean distance without Python loops:
import numpy as np
def fast_wdist(A, B, W):
"""
Compute the weighted euclidean distance between two arrays of points:
D{i,j} =
sqrt( ((A{0,i}-B{0,j})/W{0,i})^2 + ... + ((A{k,i}-B{k,j})/W{k,i})^2 )
inputs:
A is an (k, m) array of coordinates
B is an (k, n) array of coordinates
W is an (k, m) array of weights
returns:
D is an (m, n) array of weighted euclidean distances
"""
# compute the differences and apply the weights in one go using
# broadcasting jujitsu. the result is (n, k, m)
wdiff = (A[np.newaxis,...] - B[np.newaxis,...].T) / W[np.newaxis,...]
# square and sum over the second axis, take the sqrt and transpose. the
# result is an (m, n) array of weighted euclidean distances
D = np.sqrt((wdiff*wdiff).sum(1)).T
return D
To check that this works OK, we'll compare it to a slower version that uses nested Python loops:
def slow_wdist(A, B, W):
k,m = A.shape
_,n = B.shape
D = np.zeros((m, n))
for ii in xrange(m):
for jj in xrange(n):
wdiff = (A[:,ii] - B[:,jj]) / W[:,ii]
D[ii,jj] = np.sqrt((wdiff**2).sum())
return D
First, let's make sure that the two functions give the same answer:
# make some random points and weights
def setup(k=2, m=100, n=300):
return np.random.randn(k,m), np.random.randn(k,n),np.random.randn(k,m)
a, b, w = setup()
d0 = slow_wdist(a, b, w)
d1 = fast_wdist(a, b, w)
print np.allclose(d0, d1)
# True
Needless to say, the version that uses broadcasting rather than Python loops is several orders of magnitude faster:
%%timeit a, b, w = setup()
slow_wdist(a, b, w)
# 1 loops, best of 3: 647 ms per loop
%%timeit a, b, w = setup()
fast_wdist(a, b, w)
# 1000 loops, best of 3: 620 us per loop
You could try removing the square root, since if a>b, it follows that a squared > b squared... and computers are REALLY slow at square roots normally.