I have two traits, each with a type parameter for one of its members. In the first trait, I have a function that takes an instance of the second trait and an instance of the
Try:
def Refuel(car: CarType)(fuel: car.FuelType): Garage = {
Although Daniel's answer works, I would like to point out an alternative, which is kind of my own panacea. I had been struggling a lot with getting path dependent types right, and ended up with the following strategy. It's a bit more 'ugly' as you now need to write an additional type parameter, but this approach has never let me down:
trait Garage {
type CarType <: Car[CarType] // CarType appears as representation type on the right
def cars: Seq[CarType]
def copy(Cars: Seq[CarType]): Garage
def refuel(car: CarType, fuel: CarType#FuelType): Garage = copy(
cars.map { // map is more concise for what you try to achieve
case `car` => car.refuel(fuel) // backticks to find the particular car
case other => other
})
}
trait Car[C <: Car[C]] { // add a 'representation type'
type FuelType <: Fuel
def fuel: FuelType
// use 'C' instead of 'Car' everywhere, and qualify the type member with 'C#'
def copy(fuel: C#FuelType): C
def refuel(fuel: C#FuelType): C = copy(fuel)
}
trait Fuel
I don't know if this 'representation type' concept has a formal name (I would be interested to know). I tried to look up who taught me this, but didn't find it (at least in stackoverflow).