I\'ve tried searching around and can\'t figure out an easy way to do this, so I\'m hoping your expertise can help.
I have a pandas data frame with two columns
<I think you want to use the replace() method that strings have, it's orders of magnitude faster than using regular expressions (I just checked quickly in IPython):
%timeit mystr.replace("ello", "")
The slowest run took 7.64 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached
1000000 loops, best of 3: 250 ns per loop
%timeit re.sub("ello","", "e")
The slowest run took 21.03 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached
1000000 loops, best of 3: 4.7 µs per loop
If you need further speed improvements after that, you should look into numpy's vectorize function (but I think the speed up from using replace instead of regular expressions should be pretty substantial).
You could do it with replace method and regex
argument and then use str.strip
:
In [605]: testing.FULL_NAME.replace(testing.NAME[testing.NAME.notnull()], '', regex = True).str.strip()
Out[605]:
0 LAST
1 NaN
2 FIRST LAST
3 FIRST
4 FIRST LAST
5 ANOTHER NAME
6 LAST NAME
Name: FULL_NAME, dtype: object
Note You need to pass notnull
to testing.NAME
because without it NaN
values also will be replaced to empty string
Benchmarking is slower then fastest @johnchase solution but I think it's more readable and use all pandas methods of DataFrames and Series:
In [607]: %timeit testing['NEW'] = testing.FULL_NAME.replace(testing.NAME[testing.NAME.notnull()], '', regex = True).str.strip()
100 loops, best of 3: 4.56 ms per loop
In [661]: %timeit testing ['NEW'] = [e.replace(k, '') for e, k in zip(testing.FULL_NAME.astype('str'), testing.NAME.astype('str'))]
1000 loops, best of 3: 450 µs per loop
Here is one solution that is quite a bit faster than your current solution, I'm not convinced that there wouldn't be something faster though
In [13]: import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
n = 1000
testing = pd.DataFrame({'NAME':[
'FIRST', np.nan, 'NAME2', 'NAME3',
'NAME4', 'NAME5', 'NAME6']*n, 'FULL_NAME':['FIRST LAST', np.nan, 'FIRST LAST', 'FIRST NAME3', 'FIRST NAME4 LAST', 'ANOTHER NAME', 'LAST NAME']*n})
This is kind of a long one liner but it should do what you need
Fasted solution I can come up with is using replace
as mentioned in another answer:
In [37]: %timeit testing ['NEW2'] = [e.replace(k, '') for e, k in zip(testing.FULL_NAME.astype('str'), testing.NAME.astype('str'))]
100 loops, best of 3: 4.67 ms per loop
Original answer:
In [14]: %timeit testing ['NEW'] = [''.join(str(e).split(k)) for e, k in zip(testing.FULL_NAME.astype('str'), testing.NAME.astype('str'))]
100 loops, best of 3: 7.24 ms per loop
compared to your current solution:
In [16]: %timeit testing['NEW1'] = testing.apply(address_remove, axis=1)
10 loops, best of 3: 166 ms per loop
These get you the same answer as your current solution