Say you have a collection of points with coordinates on a Cartesian coordinate system.
I understood that you have one-to-one correspondence between the wrapped and unwrapped grid points. And I assume that the deformation is not so extreme that you might have intersecting grid lines (like the image you show).
The strategy is exactly what Jacob suggests: Triangulate the two grids such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between triangles, locate the point to be mapped in the triangulation and then use barycentric coordinates in the corresponding triangle to compute the new point location.
Preprocess
WT
.WT
add a triangle between the corresponding vertices in the unwrapped grid. This gives a triangulation UWT
of the unwrapped points.Map a point p
into the wrapped grid
T(p1,p2,p3)
in the UWT
which contains p
.(b1,b2,b3)
of p
in T(p1,p2,p3)
Tw(q1,q2,q3)
be the triangle in WT
corresponding to T(p1,p2,p3)
. The new position is b1 * q1 + b2 * q2 + b3 * q3
.Remarks This gives a deformation function as a linear spline. For smoother behavior one could use the same triangulation but do higher order approximation which would lead to a bit more complicated computation instead of the barycentric coordinates.
A lot depends on how many existing points you have. If you have only one, there's not really much you can do with it -- you can offset the second point by the same amount in the same direction, but you don't have enough data to really do any better than that.
If you have a fair number of existing points, you can do a surface fit through those points, and use that to approximate the proper position of the new point. Given N points, you can always get a perfect fit using an order N polynomial, but you rarely want to do that -- instead, you usually guess that the stretch function is a fairly low-order function (e.g. quadratic or cubic) and fit a surface to the points on that basis. You then place your new point based on the function for your fitted surface.
Ok, so this sounds like image warping. This is what you should do:
Create a Delaunay triangulation of your unwarped grid and use your knowledge of the correspondences between the warped and unwarped grid to create the triangulation for the warped grid. Now you know the corresponding triangles in each image and since there is no overlapping, you should be able to perform the next step without much difficulty.
Now, to find the corresponding point A
, in the warped image:
A
lies in and use the transformation between the triangle in the unwarped grid and the warped grid to figure out the new position.This is explained explicitly in detail here.
Another (much more complicated) method is the Thin Plate Spline (which is also explained in the slides above).
The other answers are great. The only thing I'd add is that you might want to take a look at Free form deformation as a way of describing the deformations.
If that's useful, then it's quite possible to fit a deformation grid/lattice to your known pairs, and then you have a very fast method of deforming future points.