In my current application, I need to be able to do this type of query:
SELECT MIN((colA, colB, colC))
FROM mytable
WHERE (colA, colB, colC) BETWEEN (200, \'
---EDIT---: (Previous wrong trials removed)
2nd try (not really relational algebra).
This works but only when the fields are char(1):
SELECT colA, colB, colC
FROM mytable
WHERE CONCAT(colA, colB, colC)
BETWEEN CONCAT('A', 'B', 'C')
AND CONCAT('D', 'E', 'F')
ORDER BY colA, colB, colC
LIMIT 1 ;
I thought that a view that shows all combinations of tuples from mytable
that are less than or equal to tuples of the same table might be helpful, as it can be used for other comparisons:
CREATE VIEW lessORequal AS
( SELECT a.colA AS smallA
, a.colB AS smallB
, a.colC AS smallC
, b.colA AS largeA
, b.colB AS largeB
, b.colC AS largeC
FROM mytable a
JOIN mytable b
ON (a.colA < b.colA)
OR ( (a.colA = b.colA)
AND ( (a.colB < b.colB)
OR (a.colB = b.colB
AND a.colC <= b.colC)
)
)
) ;
Using similar technique, this solves the question. It works with any kind of fields (int, float, char of any length). It's going to be kind of awkard and complicated though if one tries to add more fields.
SELECT colA, colB, colC
FROM mytable m
WHERE ( ('A' < colA)
OR ( ('A' = colA)
AND ( ('B' < colB)
OR ('B' = colB
AND 'C' <= colC)
)
)
)
AND ( (colA < 'D')
OR ( (colA = 'D')
AND ( (colB < 'E')
OR (colB = 'E'
AND colC <= 'F')
)
)
)
ORDER BY colA, colB, colC
LIMIT 1 ;
One also define a function:
CREATE FUNCTION IslessORequalThan( lowA CHAR(1)
, lowB CHAR(1)
, lowC CHAR(1)
, highA CHAR(1)
, highB CHAR(1)
, highC CHAR(1)
)
RETURNS boolean
RETURN ( (lowA < highA)
OR ( (lowA = highA)
AND ( (lowB < highB)
OR ( (lowB = highB)
AND (lowC <= highC)
)
)
)
);
and use it to solve the same or similar problems. This solves the question again. The query is elegant but a new function has to be created if the type or number of fields is changed.
SELECT colA
, colB
, colC
FROM mytable
WHERE IslessORequalThan( 'A', 'B', 'C', colA, colB, colC )
AND IslessORequalThan( colA, colB, colC, 'D', 'E', 'F' )
ORDER BY colA, colB, colC
LIMIT 1;
Until then, and because the condition
(colA, colB, colC) BETWEEN ('A', 'B', 'C') AND ('D', 'E', 'F')
was not allowed in MySQL, I thought that
('A', 'B', 'C') <= (colA, colB, colC)
was not allowed as well. But I was wrong.
Just do:
SELECT colA
, colB
, colC
FROM mytable
WHERE ( ('A', 'B', 'C') <= (colA, colB, colC ) )
AND ( (colA, colB, colC) <= ('D', 'E', 'F' ) )
ORDER BY colA, colB, colC
LIMIT 1
;
It works just fine. And I suspect is should be pretty fast, too.
This is equivalent but it may have better performance, depending on your tables:
SELECT m.colA
, m.colB
, m.colC
FROM mytable m
WHERE ( ('A', 'B', 'C') <= (m.colA, m.colB, m.colC) )
AND ( (m.colA, m.colB, m.colC) <= ('D', 'E', 'F') )
AND NOT EXISTS
( SELECT 1
FROM mytable b
WHERE (b.colA, b.colB, b.colC) < (m. colA, m.colB, m.colC)
AND ( ('A', 'B', 'C') <= (b.colA, b.colB, b.colC) )
);