I am seeking clarification of how to ensure an atomic transaction in a plpgsql function, and where the isolation level is set for this particular change to the database.
A plpgsql function automatically runs inside a transaction. It all succeeds or it all fails. The manual:
Functions and trigger procedures are always executed within a transaction established by an outer query — they cannot start or commit that transaction, since there would be no context for them to execute in. However, a block containing an
EXCEPTION
clause effectively forms a subtransaction that can be rolled back without affecting the outer transaction. For more about that see Section 42.6.6.
So, if you need to, you can catch an exception that theoretically might occur (but is very unlikely).
Details on trapping errors in the manual.
Your function reviewed and simplified:
CREATE FUNCTION foo(v_weather text
, v_timeofday text
, v_speed text
, v_behavior text)
RETURNS SETOF custombehavior AS
$func$
BEGIN
DELETE FROM custombehavior
WHERE weather = 'RAIN'
AND timeofday = 'NIGHT'
AND speed = '45MPH';
INSERT INTO custombehavior (weather, timeofday, speed, behavior)
SELECT v_weather, v_timeofday, v_speed, v_behavior
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT FROM defaultbehavior
WHERE a = 'RAIN'
AND b = 'NIGHT'
AND c = '45MPH'
);
RETURN QUERY
SELECT * FROM custombehavior WHERE ... ;
END
$func$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
If you actually need to begin/end transactions like indicated in the title look to SQL procedures in Postgres 11 or later (CREATE PROCEDURE). Related:
START TRANSACTION;
select foo() ;
COMMIT;
"Unfortunately Postgres has no stored procedures, so you always need to manage the transaction in the calling code" – a_horse_with_no_name
Transaction in an exception block - how?