Efficient way to compute p^q (exponentiation), where q is an integer

前端 未结 3 1510
时光取名叫无心
时光取名叫无心 2020-12-15 20:33

What is an efficient way to compute pq, where q is an integer?

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-12-15 20:52

    I assume by ^ you mean power function, and not bitwise xor.

    The development of an efficient power function for any type of p and any positive integral q is the subject of an entire section, 3.2, in Stepanov's and McJones's book Elements of Programming. The language in the book is not C++, but is very easily translated into C++.

    It covers several optimizations, including exponentiation by squaring, conversion to tail recursion then iteration, and accumulation-variable elimination, and relates the optimizations to the notions of type regularity and associative operations to prove it works for all such types.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-15 21:04

    Exponentiation by squaring uses only O(lg q) multiplications.

    template <typename T>
    T expt(T p, unsigned q)
    {
        T r(1);
    
        while (q != 0) {
            if (q % 2 == 1) {    // q is odd
                r *= p;
                q--;
            }
            p *= p;
            q /= 2;
        }
    
        return r;
    }
    

    This should work on any monoid (T, operator*) where a T constructed from 1 is the identity element. That includes all numeric types.

    Extending this to signed q is easy: just divide one by the result of the above for the absolute value of q (but as usual, be careful when computing the absolute value).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-15 21:04

    Assuming that ^ means exponentiation and that q is runtime variable, use std::pow(double, int).

    EDIT: For completeness due to the comments on this answer: I asked the question Why was std::pow(double, int) removed from C++11? about the missing function and in fact pow(double, int) wasn't removed in C++0x, just the language was changed. However, it appears that libraries may not actually optimize it due to result accuracy concerns.

    Even given that I would still use pow until measurement showed me that it needed to be optimized.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题