Fast sqrt in Java at the expense of accuracy

后端 未结 3 379
温柔的废话
温柔的废话 2020-12-15 11:23

I am looking for a fast square root implementation in Java for double values in the input range of [0, 2*10^12]. For any value in this range, the precision should be upto 5

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2020-12-15 11:47

    Try this

    double d = 289358932.0;
    double sqrt = Double.longBitsToDouble( ( ( Double.doubleToLongBits( d )-(1l<<52) )>>1 ) + ( 1l<<61 ) );
    

    I haven't benchmarked it, but I'd expect it to be faster. The accuracy isn't extremely good, but try it out and see if it meets your needs. I think you can add an additional bias term a to the end of the expression to make it more accurate.

    EDIT: You can drastically improve the accuracy by passing it through a round or two of Newton's method

    double better = (sqrt + d/sqrt)/2.0;
    double evenbetter = (better + d/better)/2.0;
    

    The second pass gives you almost the exact value of the square root.

    sqrt            17022.533813476562
    better          17010.557763511835
    evenbetter      17010.553547724947
    Math.sqrt()     17010.553547724423
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-15 12:02

    I don't believe (without a benchmark to prove this wrong) that a pure Java implementation could me much faster than Math.sqrt(). Both the Oracle JRE implementation and the OpenJDK implementation are native implementations.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-15 12:02

    Once you give the code time to warm up. Math.sqrt() can be pretty fast

    static double[] values = new double[500 * 1000];
    
    public static void main(String... args) {
        for (int i = 0; i < values.length; i++) values[i] = i;
    
        for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
            long start = System.nanoTime();
    
            for (int i = 1; i < values.length; i++) {
                values[i] = Math.sqrt(values[i]);
            }
            long time = System.nanoTime() - start;
    
            System.out.printf("Took %d ns to Math.sqrt on average%n", time / values.length);
        }
    }
    

    prints

    Took 20 ns to Math.sqrt on average
    Took 22 ns to Math.sqrt on average
    Took 9 ns to Math.sqrt on average
    Took 9 ns to Math.sqrt on average
    Took 9 ns to Math.sqrt on average
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题