Java Optional - If Else Statements

Question

So after some reading I\'ve seen that

if (optional.isPresent()) {
    //do smth
}

is not the preferred way to use Optional (http://www.ora

Answer 1

To take it further, if you have multiple if (optional.isPresent()) or if (obj != null)

You can do this:

(getN returns Optional<Car>)

return get1().map(Optional::of)
.orElseGet(() -> get2()).map(Optional::of)
.orElseGet(() -> get3()).map(Optional::of);

I.e. would be like this using if statements

Optional<Car> car = get1();
if (car.isPresent()){
  return car;
}
car = get2();
if (car.isPresent()){
  return car;
}
car = get3();
if (car.isPresent()){
  return car;
}
return Optional.empty();

Answer 2

If you can incorporate the name into the Car constructor, then you can write this:

car = optional.map(id -> getCar(id))
              .orElseGet(() -> new Car(carName));

If you must call the setter separately from your constructor, you would end up with something like this:

car = optional.map(id -> getCar(id))
              .orElseGet(() -> {
                  Car c = new Car();
                  c.setName(carName);
                  return c;
              });

Answer 3

You can use Optional as following.

Car car = optional.map(id -> getCar(id))
            .orElseGet(() -> {
                Car c = new Car();
                c.setName(carName);
                return c;
            });

Writing with if-else statement is imperative style and it requires the variable car to be declared before if-else block.

Using map in Optional is more functional style. And this approach doesn't need variable declaration beforehand and is recommended way of using Optional.