_.isFunction(a) vs. typeof a === 'function'? javascript

前端 未结 2 1874
失恋的感觉
失恋的感觉 2020-12-14 05:54

I think it might be only performance case - http://jsperf.com/comparing-underscore-js-isfunction-with-typeof-function/2

And seems that typeof is faster.

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-14 06:00

    Firstly, Underscore doesn't use that implementation anymore. It optimizes to typeof unless typeof /./ returns function, as it did atleast in older versions of Chrome

    You can find this in the source code: http://underscorejs.org/underscore.js

    // Optimize `isFunction` if appropriate.
      if (typeof (/./) !== 'function') {
        _.isFunction = function(obj) {
          return typeof obj === 'function';
        };
      }
    

    New jsperf: http://jsperf.com/comparing-underscore-js-isfunction-with-typeof-function/3

    It still shows quite a performance hit in FF (but MUCH less than the naive implementation you posted in the question), which is due to the overhead of a function call vs just inlining code.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-14 06:06

    There is no reason not to use typeof.

    Not only is it faster but the ECMAScript specification ensures that all functions have a type of "function" and that only functions can have a type of "function" :

    enter image description here

    This operator was specifically designed to get the type of a value, so why not use it ?

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题