This is not a major problem, just something I want to know whether or not is possible.
Let\'s say we have two commits, abcd123
and wxyz789
,
git revert -n <commits>
git commit
The first command will do all the reverts without create any commits and stage the final result (the -n option). After that, the commit command creates a single commit.
In case of complicated reverts, which changes each other, the revert --no-commit
might be problematic.
My simple solution was to do real revert, and the squash:
git revert <all commits>
git rebase -i
And then mark all the reverts as squash
, except the first one, to create a single commit.
You can do:
git revert abcd123
git revert --no-commit wxyz789
git commit --amend
... and then write an appropriate commit message describing the combined effect of reverting both commits.