I am trying, in vain it seems, to be able to pass additional parameters back to the success callback method that I have created for a successful ajax call. A little backgro
You can use indexValue attribute for passing :
var someData = "hello";
jQuery.ajax({
url: "http://maps.google.com/maps/api/js?v=3",
indexValue: {param1:someData, param2:"Other data 2", param3: "Other data 3"},
dataType: "script"
}).done(function() {
console.log(this.indexValue.param1);
console.log(this.indexValue.param2);
console.log(this.indexValue.param3);
});
Put this into your $.ajax parameters.
invokedata: {
data1: "yourdata",
data2: "moredata"
}
In the success function use it like this
this.invokedata.data1;
this.invokedata.data2;
Your $.ajax call and the success function must also be a part of the same object. Put your functions in an object and define them like this
function myObject {
var getImage = function(..) { }
var loadImagesInSelect = function(..) { }
}
Updated: If you're using jQuery 1.4 use this to simplify things a bit:
success: jQuery.proxy(function (data) {
var select = $j(this);
select.empty();
$j(data).each(function() {
var theValue = $j(this)[0]["@value"];
var theId = $j(this)[0]["@name"];
select.append("<option value='" + theId + "'>" + theValue + "</option>");
});
select.children(":first").attr("selected", true);
}, selectBox)
This is what I did, and it also worked fine:
$.ajax('URL', {
myCustomControl: selectBox,
myCustomVariable: 'teste',
data:
{
myData: 1
},
success: function (data, textStats, jqXHR) {
myFunction(data, textStats, jqXHR, this.myCustomControl, this.myCustomVariable);
}
});
You can add controls and variables to the parameters of your ajax call.
this
is Out of ScopeJust so you (or anyone else) understand(s)1, the reason that this
was undefined in loadImagesInSelect()
in your original example was because that function was under a different scope, and scopes don't "cascade" like that2.
When you specified a "context" of selectBox
in your AJAX call, it set the context (this
) for the functions given to "success" and "error". (It just so happens that they were both anonymous functions.) At this point, this
is defined in both of these functions, as the value of selectBox
. Now, in the function passed to "success", you call loadImagesInSelect()
. When you call a function, it creates a new scope. In this scope, this
will be window
in non-strict mode and undefined
in strict mode.
// this = window (global scope)
$j = jQuery.noConflict();
function getImages(urlValue, selectBox) {
// this = undefined (function scope level 1)
$j.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: $j(urlValue).val(),
dataType: "jsonp",
context: selectBox,
success: function(data) {
// this = selectBox (function scope level 2)
loadImagesInSelect(data);
},
error: function(xhr, ajaxOptions, thrownError) {
// this = selectBox (function scope level 2)
alert(xhr.status);
alert(thrownError);
}
});
}
function loadImagesInSelect(data) {
// this = undefined (function scope level 3)
var select = $j(this);
select.empty();
$j(data).each(function() {
var theValue = $j(this)[0]["@value"];
var theId = $j(this)[0]["@name"];
select.append("<option value='" + theId + "'>" + theValue + "</option>");
});
select.children(":first").attr("selected", true);
}
$.proxy()
is RedundantThe use of $.proxy()
in your updated code is redundant. You use $.proxy()
to get this
to the function that was formerly called loadImagesInSelect()
, but you moved that function up into "success" anyway (instead of calling it from within "success"). It already has access now to the value of this
specified by "context".
You could remove the $.proxy()
wrapper around your "success" function in your updated code and it would still work.
I know it's been years since you asked your question, but I hope this helps.
this
variable) still isn't available in the inner function.undefined
with window
for non-strict mode.Function.prototype.bind()
in ECMAScript 5.