If I have a struct like
struct account {
int account_number;
};
Then what\'s the difference between doing
myAccount.acco
-> is a pointer dereference and . accessor combined
printf("Book title: %s\n", book->subject);
printf("Book code: %d\n", (*book).book_code);
-> is a shorthand for (*x).field
, where x
is a pointer to a variable of type struct account
, and field
is a field in the struct, such as account_number
.
If you have a pointer to a struct, then saying
accountp->account_number;
is much more concise than
(*accountp).account_number;
If myAccount
is a pointer, use this syntax:
myAccount->account_number;
If it's not, use this one instead:
myAccount.account_number;
You use .
when you're dealing with variables. You use ->
when you are dealing with pointers.
For example:
struct account {
int account_number;
};
Declare a new variable of type struct account
:
struct account s;
...
// initializing the variable
s.account_number = 1;
Declare a
as a pointer to struct account
:
struct account *a;
...
// initializing the variable
a = &some_account; // point the pointer to some_account
a->account_number = 1; // modifying the value of account_number
Using a->account_number = 1;
is an alternate syntax for (*a).account_number = 1;
I hope this helps.
yes you can use struct membrs both the ways...
one is with DOt:(" . ")
myAccount.account_number;
anotherone is:(" -> ")
(&myAccount)->account_number;