Python: two-curve gaussian fitting with non-linear least-squares

Question

My knowledge of maths is limited which is why I am probably stuck. I have a spectra to which I am trying to fit two Gaussian peaks. I can fit to the largest peak, but I cann

Answer 1

This code worked for me providing that you are only fitting a function that is a combination of two Gaussian distributions.

I just made a residuals function that adds two Gaussian functions and then subtracts them from the real data.

The parameters (p) that I passed to Numpy's least squares function include: the mean of the first Gaussian function (m), the difference in the mean from the first and second Gaussian functions (dm, i.e. the horizontal shift), the standard deviation of the first (sd1), and the standard deviation of the second (sd2).

import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import leastsq
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

######################################
# Setting up test data
def norm(x, mean, sd):
  norm = []
  for i in range(x.size):
    norm += [1.0/(sd*np.sqrt(2*np.pi))*np.exp(-(x[i] - mean)**2/(2*sd**2))]
  return np.array(norm)

mean1, mean2 = 0, -2
std1, std2 = 0.5, 1 

x = np.linspace(-20, 20, 500)
y_real = norm(x, mean1, std1) + norm(x, mean2, std2)

######################################
# Solving
m, dm, sd1, sd2 = [5, 10, 1, 1]
p = [m, dm, sd1, sd2] # Initial guesses for leastsq
y_init = norm(x, m, sd1) + norm(x, m + dm, sd2) # For final comparison plot

def res(p, y, x):
  m, dm, sd1, sd2 = p
  m1 = m
  m2 = m1 + dm
  y_fit = norm(x, m1, sd1) + norm(x, m2, sd2)
  err = y - y_fit
  return err

plsq = leastsq(res, p, args = (y_real, x))

y_est = norm(x, plsq[0][0], plsq[0][2]) + norm(x, plsq[0][0] + plsq[0][1], plsq[0][3])

plt.plot(x, y_real, label='Real Data')
plt.plot(x, y_init, 'r.', label='Starting Guess')
plt.plot(x, y_est, 'g.', label='Fitted')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

Answer 2

You can use Gaussian mixture models from scikit-learn:

from sklearn import mixture
import matplotlib.pyplot
import matplotlib.mlab
import numpy as np
clf = mixture.GMM(n_components=2, covariance_type='full')
clf.fit(yourdata)
m1, m2 = clf.means_
w1, w2 = clf.weights_
c1, c2 = clf.covars_
histdist = matplotlib.pyplot.hist(yourdata, 100, normed=True)
plotgauss1 = lambda x: plot(x,w1*matplotlib.mlab.normpdf(x,m1,np.sqrt(c1))[0], linewidth=3)
plotgauss2 = lambda x: plot(x,w2*matplotlib.mlab.normpdf(x,m2,np.sqrt(c2))[0], linewidth=3)
plotgauss1(histdist[1])
plotgauss2(histdist[1])

You can also use the function below to fit the number of Gaussian you want with ncomp parameter:

from sklearn import mixture
%pylab

def fit_mixture(data, ncomp=2, doplot=False):
    clf = mixture.GMM(n_components=ncomp, covariance_type='full')
    clf.fit(data)
    ml = clf.means_
    wl = clf.weights_
    cl = clf.covars_
    ms = [m[0] for m in ml]
    cs = [numpy.sqrt(c[0][0]) for c in cl]
    ws = [w for w in wl]
    if doplot == True:
        histo = hist(data, 200, normed=True)
        for w, m, c in zip(ws, ms, cs):
            plot(histo[1],w*matplotlib.mlab.normpdf(histo[1],m,np.sqrt(c)), linewidth=3)
    return ms, cs, ws

Answer 3

coeffs 0 and 4 are degenerate - there is absolutely nothing in the data that can decide between them. you should use a single zero level parameter instead of two (ie remove one of them from your code). this is probably what is stopping your fit (ignore the comments here saying this is not possible - there are clearly at least two peaks in that data and you should certainly be able to fit to that).

(it may not be clear why i am suggesting this, but what is happening is that coeffs 0 and 4 can cancel each other out. they can both be zero, or one could be 100 and the other -100 - either way, the fit is just as good. this "confuses" the fitting routine, which spends its time trying to work out what they should be, when there is no single right answer, because whatever value one is, the other can just be the negative of that, and the fit will be the same).

in fact, from the plot, it looks like there may be no need for a zero level at all. i would try dropping both of those and seeing how the fit looks.

also, there is no need to fit coeffs 1 and 5 (or the zero point) in the least squares. instead, because the model is linear in those you could calculate their values each loop. this will make things faster, but is not critical. i just noticed you say your maths is not so good, so probably ignore this one.