Safety of Thread.current[] usage in rails

后端 未结 4 1893
栀梦
栀梦 2020-12-12 14:21

I keep getting conflicting opinions on the practice of storing information in the Thread.current hash (e.g., the current_user, the current subdomain, etc.). The

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2020-12-12 14:38

    The accepted answer covers the question but as Rails 5 now provides a "Abstract super class" ActiveSupport::CurrentAttributes which uses Thread.current.

    I thought I would provide a link to that as a possible(unpopular) solution.

    https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activesupport/lib/active_support/current_attributes.rb

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 14:42

    The accepted answer is technically accurate, but as pointed out in the answer gently, and in http://m.onkey.org/thread-safety-for-your-rails not so gently:

    Don't use thread local storage, Thread.current if you don't absolutely have to

    The gem for request_store is another solution (better) but just read the readme there for more reasons to stay away from thread local storage.

    There is almost always a better way.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 15:00

    There is not an specific reason to stay away from thread-local variables, the main issues are:

    • it's harder to test them, as you will have to remember to set the thread-local variables when you're testing out code that uses it
    • classes that use thread locals will need knowledge that these objects are not available to them but inside a thread-local variable and this kind of indirection usually breaks the law of demeter
    • not cleaning up thread-locals might be an issue if your framework reuses threads (the thread-local variable would be already initiated and code that relies on ||= calls to initialize variables might fail

    So, while it's not completely out of question to use, the best approach is not to use them, but from time to time you hit a wall where a thread local is going to be the simplest possible solution without changing quite a lot of code and you will have to compromise, have a less than perfect object oriented model with the thread local or changing quite a lot of code to do the same.

    So, it's mostly a matter of thinking which is going to be the best solution for your case and if you're really going down the thread-local path, I'd surely advise you to do it with blocks that remember to clean up after they are done, like the following:

    around_filter :do_with_current_user
    
    def do_with_current_user
        Thread.current[:current_user] = self.current_user
        begin
            yield
        ensure
            Thread.current[:current_user] = nil
        end      
    end
    

    This ensures the thread local variable is cleaned up before being used if this thread is recycled.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-12 15:00

    This little gem ensures your thread/request local variables not stick between requests: https://github.com/steveklabnik/request_store

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题