Is it possible to flatten sub-object fields while parsing with serde_json?

后端 未结 1 517
栀梦
栀梦 2020-12-11 17:15

#[serde(rename)] seems to be the right option, but the documentation does not state if it is possible or how to do it.

This JSON object:



        
相关标签:
1条回答
  • 2020-12-11 17:21

    There is no built-in way to do this with attributes, but you can write your own Deserialize impl for your Object type that deserializes first to some intermediate helper representation and then rearranges the data into the desired struct.

    #[macro_use]
    extern crate serde_derive;
    
    extern crate serde;
    extern crate serde_json;
    
    use serde::{Deserialize, Deserializer};
    
    #[derive(Debug)]
    struct Object {
        name: String,
        count: i32,
        foo: String,
    }
    
    impl<'de> Deserialize<'de> for Object {
        fn deserialize<D>(deserializer: D) -> Result<Self, D::Error>
            where D: Deserializer<'de>
        {
            #[derive(Deserialize)]
            struct Outer {
                name: String,
                info: Inner,
            }
    
            #[derive(Deserialize)]
            struct Inner {
                count: i32,
                foo: String,
            }
    
            let helper = Outer::deserialize(deserializer)?;
            Ok(Object {
                name: helper.name,
                count: helper.info.count,
                foo: helper.info.foo,
            })
        }
    }
    
    fn main() {
        let j = r#"{
                     "name": "myobject",
                     "info": {
                       "count": 3,
                       "foo": "bar"
                     }
                   }"#;
    
        println!("{:#?}", serde_json::from_str::<Object>(j).unwrap());
    }
    

    The output is:

    Object {
        name: "myobject",
        count: 3,
        foo: "bar"
    }
    

    There are three materially different places where insignificant nesting arises:

    1. adjacent to other fields
    2. by itself at the top level
    3. by itself below the top level

    All three require different approaches. #1 is observed in this question.

    To solve #2 or #3, see Is there a way to omit wrapper/root objects when deserializing objects with Serde?

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题