For example, if the input number is 24635
, the least number is 23
after deleting any 3 digits.
It\'s not the same as taking the two smalles
private static int getLeastNumberAfterDelete(int num, int dighitsDel) {
String s = "";
char[] charArray = String.valueOf(num).toCharArray();
Arrays.sort(charArray); // Sort charArray
for (int i = 0; i < (charArray.length - dighitsDel); i++) {
s += charArray[i];//concatenate
}
return Integer.valueOf(s);
}
To solve this, you can follow these steps −
Define a stack st, create an empty string ret
n := size of num
for i in range 0 to n – 1
while k is non zero and stack is not empty and top of stack > num[i]
delete from the stack and decrease k by 1
insert num[i] into st
while k is not 0, delete element from the stack
while the stack is not empty
ret := ret + top of stack, delete element from stack
now reverse the ret string
ans := an empty string, and i := 0
while i < size of ret and ret[i] is not ‘0’
increase i by 1
for i < size of ret
ans := ans + ret[i]
ret := ans
return “0” if size of ret is 0, otherwise, ret
C++ solution:
class Solution {
public:
string removeKdigits(string num, int k) {
stack st;
string ret = "";
int n = num.size();
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++){
while(k && !st.empty() && st.top() > num[i]){
st.pop();
k--;
}
st.push(num[i]);
}
while(k--)st.pop();
while(!st.empty()){
ret += st.top();
st.pop();
}
reverse(ret.begin(), ret.end());
string ans = "";
int i = 0;
while(i <ret.size() && ret[i] == '0')i++;
for(; i < ret.size(); i++)ans += ret[i];
ret = ans;
return ret.size() == 0? "0" : ret;
}
};
Deleting k
digits means keeping n - k
digits, where n
is the total number of digits.
Use a stack that you keep sorted ascendingly. You remove elements from it as long as you can still make it to n - k
digits and your current element is smaller than the top of the stack:
push(2) => 2
push(4) because 2 < 4 => 24
push(6) because 4 < 6 => 246
pop() because 3 < 6 and we can still end up with 2 digits => 24
pop() for the same reason => 2
push(3) => 23
push(5) => 235
Then just take the first k
digits => 23
. Or you can make sure never to push more than k
digits, and then the final stack is your solution.
Note that you cannot pop elements if that means you will not be able to build a solution of k
digits. For this, you need to check the current number of elements in the stack and the number of digits to the right of your current position on the input number.
Pseudocode:
stack = []
for each d in digits:
while !stack.empty() and d < stack.top() and (*):
stack.pop()
if stack.size() < n - k:
stack.push(d)
(*) - exercise, fill in the condition that prevents you
from popping elements if you still want to be able to get to a solution.
Hint: count how many elements the for loop went over already
and see how many are left. Also consider how many you have left in the stack.
Since each element enters and leaves the stack at most once, the complexity is O(n)
.
Very simple Algorithm come to mine mind
indexOf()
), if exists remove. check if number of removed digit are equal to no of input digits to b removed . If not , check 9 existence gaain till it does not exist (indexOf()
will return -1 under java) to see if same digit is repeated . Now repeat if for 8 till expected no of digit are removedFor example :-
Given number is 24635
and no of digit to remove are 2
234
The idea is based on the fact that a character among first (n+1) characters must be there in resultant number. So we pick the smallest of first (n+1) digits and put it in result, and recur for remaining characters. Below is complete algorithm.
Initialize result as empty string i.e. res = ""
buildLowestNumber(str, n, res)
1) If n == 0, then there is nothing to remove. Append the whole 'str' to 'res' and return
2) Let 'len' be length of 'str'. If 'len' is smaller or equal to n, then everything can be removed. Append nothing to 'res' and return
3) Find the smallest character among first (n+1) characters of 'str'. Let the index of smallest character be minIndex. Append 'str[minIndex]' to 'res' and recur for substring after minIndex and for n = n-minIndex
buildLowestNumber(str[minIndex+1..len-1], n-minIndex).
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
// A recursive function that removes 'n' characters from 'str'
// to store the smallest possible number in 'res'
void buildLowestNumberRec(string str, int n, string &res)
{
// If there are 0 characters to remove from str,
// append everything to result
if (n == 0)
{
res.append(str);
return;
}
int len = str.length();
// If there are more characters to remove than string
// length, then append nothing to result
if (len <= n)
return;
// Find the smallest character among first (n+1) characters
// of str.
int minIndex = 0;
for (int i = 1; i<=n ; i++)
if (str[i] < str[minIndex])
minIndex = i;
// Append the smallest character to result
res.push_back(str[minIndex]);
// substring starting from minIndex+1 to str.length() - 1.
string new_str = str.substr(minIndex+1, len-minIndex);
// Recur for the above substring and n equals to n-minIndex
buildLowestNumberRec(new_str, n-minIndex, res);
}
// A wrapper over buildLowestNumberRec()
string buildLowestNumber(string str, int n)
{
string res = "";
// Note that result is passed by reference
buildLowestNumberRec(str, n, res);
return res;
}
// Driver program to test above function
int main()
{
string str = "121198";
int n = 2;
cout << buildLowestNumber(str, n);
return 0;
}
Very simple solution.
We have n
digits, and we must remove k
of them to leave n-k
. We can easily identify what the first digit will be.
The final n-k-1
digits clearly cannot be the first digit of the answer, there simply aren't enough digits after to make a sufficiently long enough number.
We therefore simply ignore the final n-k
digits, and focus on the first k
digits and find the smallest digit in that collection of k
digits. That will be the first digit of our answer. e.g. all three-digit numbers 5XX are smaller than all number of the form 6XX, regardless of what the Xs are. (If there is a tie, where two digits share the honour of being smallest, then choose the number on the left as it gives you more flexibility later.)
Now you know what the first digit is, you can ignore it and everything to the left and repeat the whole thing recursively with the remaining digits - what is the smallest number I can make out of the remaining digits?