abstract type pattern is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure

前端 未结 2 1920
长情又很酷
长情又很酷 2020-12-10 01:10

Could someone tell me how can I avoid the warning in the code block below:

abstract class Foo[T <: Bar]{
  case class CaseClass[T <: Bar](t: T)
  def m         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-10 01:39

    Another variation to use, especially if you desire to use a trait (as opposed to using a class or abstract class which the other solution requires), looks like this:

    import scala.reflect.{ClassTag, classTag}
    
    trait Foo[B <: Bar] {
      implicit val classTagB: ClassTag[B] = classTag[B]
      ...
      def operate(barDescendant: B) =
        barDescendant match {
          case b: Bar if classTagB.runtimeClass.isInstance(b) =>
            ... //do something with value b which will be of type B
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-10 01:55

    You could use ClassTag (or TypeTag):

    import scala.reflect.ClassTag
    
    abstract class Foo[T <: Bar : ClassTag]{
      ...
      val clazz = implicitly[ClassTag[T]].runtimeClass
      def method1 = {
        case CaseClass(t) if clazz.isInstance(t) => println(t) // you could use `t.asInstanceOf[T]`
        case _ => 
      }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题