Here's a difference we bumped into that I haven't seen documented anywhere, so I'll publish it, and the solution, here in the hope that it will help someone.
We were testing "some but not all" character classes, such as "A to Z but not Q, V or X", using "[A-Z-[QVX]]" syntax. Don't know where we found it, don't know if it's documented, but it works in .Net.
For example, in Powershell, using the .Net regex class,
[regex]::ismatch("K", "^[A-Z-[QVX]]$")
returns true. Test the same input and pattern in JavaScript and it returns false, but test "K" against "^[A-Z]$" in JavaScript and it returns true.
You can use the more orthodox approach of negative lookahead to express "A to Z but not Q, V or X", eg "^(?![QVX])[A-Z]$", which will work in both Powershell and (modern) JavaScript.
Given Ben Atkin's point above about IE6 and IE7 not supporting lookahead, it may be that the only way to do this in a fool-proof (or IE7-proof) way is to expand the expression out, eg "[A-Z-[QVX]" -> "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTUWYZ". Ouch.