I am trying to create a class in VB.NET which inherits a base abstract class and also implements an interface. The interface declares a string property called Description. T
This is a strange issue and it clearly shows a difference between the C# and VB.NET compilers. I would suggest that you do implement the interface on the abstract base class as this will make the VB.NET compiler happy and at execution time your child class will still have metadata indicating that it does in fact implement IFoo
.
Is there a specific reason that the child class must be the one to declare that it implements the interface?
One way or the other, you must specify the implementation details of the IFoo interface.
What about this simple option?
Public Class MyFoo
Inherits FooBase
Implements IFoo
Overloads Property Description() As String Implements IFoo.Description
Get
Return MyBase.Description
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
MyBase.Description = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
VB requires that the implementing property declare the implementation. This is because of what I actually consider a nice feature of VB that I sometimes miss in C# -- that you can rename the member that implements the interface member.
Thus the only way to make this work without implementing IFoo.Description
in FooBase
is to declare Description
Overridable
and then define MyFoo
as:
Public Class MyFoo
Inherits FooBase
Implements IFoo
Public Overrides Property Description() As String Implements IFoo.Description
Get
Return MyBase.Description
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
MyBase.Description = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Sorry if I'm late to the party, and apologies too if this functionality has only been introduced in .NET 4, but the following is possible (now)
Public Interface IFoo
Property Description() As String
End Interface
Public MustInherit Class FooBase
Implements IFoo
Public MustOverride Property Description As String Implements IFoo.Description
End Class
Public Class MyFoo
Inherits FooBase
Private _description As String
Public Overrides Property Description As String
Get
Return _description
End Get
Set(value As String)
_description = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
VB.NET does not support implicit implementation. I also ran into this issue and had a lot of trouble.
When you work with generated classes (entities etc.) where you have to explicitly declare Implements IFoo
, it makes it impossible at all.
Therefore I submitted a connection to Microsoft and I hope you'll vote and next version of VB they will improve the compiler to be more clever.
I can't comment on M.A. Hanin's answer because of my rep, but I would recommend one small tweak to avoid compiler warnings about hiding base methods, assuming you don't want to or can't override override the property in the base class.
Public Class MyFoo
Inherits FooBase
Implements IFoo
Private Property IFoo_Description() As String Implements IFoo.Description
Get
Return Me.Description
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
Me.Description = value
End Set
End Property
End Class