From the spark structured streaming documentation:
\"This checkpoint location has to be a path in an HDFS compatible file system, and can be set as an option in the D
This problem is fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19407.
However Structured Streaming checkpointing doesn't work well in S3 because of lack of eventual consistency in S3. It's not a good idea to use S3 for checkpointing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19013.
Micheal Armburst has said that this won't be fixed in Spark, and the solution is to wait for S3guard to be implemented. S3Guard is sometime away.
you can use s3 for checkpoint but you should enable EMRFS, so that s3 consistency will be handled.
What makes an FS HDFS "compliant?" it's a file system, with the behaviours specified in Hadoop FS specification. The difference between an object store and FS is covered there, with the key point being "eventually consistent object stores without append or O(1) atomic renames are not compliant"
For S3 in particular
Spark streaming checkpoints by saving everything to a location and then renaming it to the checkpoint directory. This makes the time to checkpoint proportional to the time to do a copy of the data in S3, which is ~6-10 MB/s.
The current bit of streaming code isn't suited for s3
For now, do one of
If you are using EMR, you can pay the premium for a consistent, dynamo DB backed S3, which gives you better consistency. But copy time is still the same, so checkpointing will be just as slow
This is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19407
Should be fixed in the next release. You can set the default file system to s3 using --conf spark.hadoop.fs.defaultFS=s3
as a workaround.