There are two methods to add HTML-code to the DOM and I don\'t know what is the best way to do it.
First method
The first way is the easy on
I point to an outdated article for purposes of people testing this for themselves. The DOM methods actually beat out the innerHTML on all of my machines so that is what I prefer. However, at the time of the article innerHTML was faster on avg. Currently the difference can only be seen in huge datasets drastically.
Actually, neither methods use innerHTML
, in both cases jQuery converts the HTML to DOM nodes. From jquery-1.3.2.js:
// If a single string is passed in and it's a single tag
// just do a createElement and skip the rest
if ( !fragment && elems.length === 1 && typeof elems[0] === "string" ) {
var match = /^<(\w+)\s*\/?>$/.exec(elems[0]);
if ( match )
return [ context.createElement( match[1] ) ];
}
// ... some more code (shortened so nobody falls asleep) ...
// Convert html string into DOM nodes
if ( typeof elem === "string" ) {
// Fix "XHTML"-style tags in all browsers
elem = elem.replace(/(<(\w+)[^>]*?)\/>/g, function(all, front, tag){
return tag.match(/^(abbr|br|col|img|input|link|meta|param|hr|area|embed)$/i) ?
all :
front + "></" + tag + ">";
});
// etc...
}
Generally speaking, using innerHTML is slower than manipulating the DOM, because it invokes the HTML parser (which will parse the HTML into the DOM anyway).
If I am going to re-use the div
later in the code, I'll build it and put it in a var
, usually with a $
prefix so I know it's a jQuery object. If it's a one-off thing I'll just do a:
$('body').append(the stuff)