python: iterating through a dictionary with list values

Question

Given a dictionary of lists, such as

d = {\'1\':[11,12], \'2\':[21,21]}

Which is more pythonic or otherwise preferable:

fo         


        

Answer 1

Here's a speed test, why not:

import random
numEntries = 1000000
d = dict(zip(range(numEntries), [random.sample(range(0, 100), 2) for x in range(numEntries)]))

def m1(d):
    for k in d:
        for x in d[k]:
            pass

def m2(d):
    for k, dk in d.iteritems():
        for x in dk:
            pass

import cProfile

cProfile.run('m1(d)')

print

cProfile.run('m2(d)')

# Ran 3 trials:
# m1: 0.205, 0.194, 0.193: average 0.197 s
# m2: 0.176, 0.166, 0.173: average 0.172 s

# Method 1 takes 15% more time than method 2

cProfile example output:

         3 function calls in 0.194 seconds

   Ordered by: standard name

   ncalls  tottime  percall  cumtime  percall filename:lineno(function)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.194    0.194 <string>:1(<module>)
        1    0.194    0.194    0.194    0.194 stackoverflow.py:7(m1)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 {method 'disable' of '_lsprof.Profiler' objects}



         4 function calls in 0.179 seconds

   Ordered by: standard name

   ncalls  tottime  percall  cumtime  percall filename:lineno(function)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.179    0.179 <string>:1(<module>)
        1    0.179    0.179    0.179    0.179 stackoverflow.py:12(m2)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 {method 'disable' of '_lsprof.Profiler' objects}
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 {method 'iteritems' of 'dict' objects}

Answer 2

I considered a couple methods:

import itertools

COLORED_THINGS = {'blue': ['sky', 'jeans', 'powerline insert mode'],
                  'yellow': ['sun', 'banana', 'phone book/monitor stand'],
                  'red': ['blood', 'tomato', 'test failure']}

def forloops():
    """ Nested for loops. """
    for color, things in COLORED_THINGS.items():
        for thing in things:
            pass

def iterator():
    """ Use itertools and list comprehension to construct iterator. """
    for color, thing in (
        itertools.chain.from_iterable(
            [itertools.product((k,), v) for k, v in COLORED_THINGS.items()])):
        pass

def iterator_gen():
    """ Use itertools and generator to construct iterator. """
    for color, thing in (
        itertools.chain.from_iterable(
            (itertools.product((k,), v) for k, v in COLORED_THINGS.items()))):
        pass

I used ipython and memory_profiler to test performance:

>>> %timeit forloops()
1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.31 µs per loop

>>> %timeit iterator()
100000 loops, best of 3: 3.58 µs per loop

>>> %timeit iterator_gen()
100000 loops, best of 3: 3.91 µs per loop

>>> %memit -r 1000 forloops()
peak memory: 35.79 MiB, increment: 0.02 MiB

>>> %memit -r 1000 iterator()
peak memory: 35.79 MiB, increment: 0.00 MiB

>>> %memit -r 1000 iterator_gen()
peak memory: 35.79 MiB, increment: 0.00 MiB

As you can see, the method had no observable impact on peak memory usage, but nested for loops were unbeatable for speed (not to mention readability).

Answer 3

Here's the list comprehension approach. Nested...

r = [[i for i in d[x]] for x in d.keys()]
print r

[[11, 12], [21, 21]]

Answer 4

My results from Brionius code:

         3 function calls in 0.173 seconds

   Ordered by: standard name

   ncalls  tottime  percall  cumtime  percall filename:lineno(function)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.173    0.173 <string>:1(<module>)
        1    0.173    0.173    0.173    0.173 speed.py:5(m1)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 {method 'disable' of '_lsprof.Prof
iler' objects}


         4 function calls in 0.185 seconds

   Ordered by: standard name

   ncalls  tottime  percall  cumtime  percall filename:lineno(function)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.185    0.185 <string>:1(<module>)
        1    0.185    0.185    0.185    0.185 speed.py:10(m2)
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 {method 'disable' of '_lsprof.Prof
iler' objects}
        1    0.000    0.000    0.000    0.000 {method 'iteritems' of 'dict' obje
cts}