How can I make the width of my match the width of the >

Question

Say, I got this code:

Answer 1

This will place the figcaption side by side with the img:

figure {
    display: table;
}
img, figcaption {
    display: table-cell;
    vertical-align: bottom;
}
figcaption {
    padding-left: 4px;
}

Here's an example. However I'm not entirely clear what you're trying to achieve - you say in the question that you want the figure to stay at 200px width, but then you comment that you want the figcaption to appear to the right, which would make the figure wider. If all you want is for the figcaption to be restricted to the width of the image, this should work:

figure {
    display: table;
    width: 1px; /* This can be any width, so long as it's narrower than any image */
}
img, figcaption {
    display: table-row;
}

Answer 2

Adding this Code to <figure> and <figcaption> CSS-Attributes helped me with the same problem. Also, it preserves the responsivenes of your images and captions.

figure { display: table; }


figcaption { display: table-caption; caption-side: bottom ; }

1. Adding display: table; sets the stage.

2. Adding display: table-caption; alone placed the caption on top of the image, The caption-side property specifies the placement of the table caption at the bottom, top is default.

Answer 3

Another solution: Use Intrinsic width

Just set width: min-content; on the figure element

DEMO (Except for IE)

figure {
  width: -webkit-min-content;
  width: -moz-min-content;
  width: min-content;
}

<figure>
  <img src=" http://placehold.it/200x150" width="200" height="150" alt="An image of a bunny rabbit." />
  <figcaption>Bunny rabits are cuddly and fluffy creatures with big ears. They eat carrots.</figcaption>
</figure>

NB: Browser Support is OK, except for IE, however they are considering implementing this

Answer 4

This was really bothering me, because I wanted to find an answer to accommodate an upgrade to HTML5 that would successfully replace my original setup of displaying images and captions- a table with two rows (or one if no caption was available).

My solution might not work for everyone, but so far, it seems to do just fine in the major browsers (O, FF, IE, S, C), as well as being responsive on mobile devices:

figure {
border: 0px solid #000;
display: table;
width: 0;
}

The idea here is that figure is pushed into existence by the width of the img and so doesn't need any kind of direction.

figure img {
display: block;
}

This is used to rid ourselves of the useless, unsightly gap between the bottom of img and the bottom of figure.

figcaption {
text-align: left;
}

Now that figure has been pushed open just wide enough to let img in, figcaption text has only that limited amount of space in which to exist. text-align is not required for this solution to function.

This solution works as well as display: table-caption, but keeps figcaption contained in any border or background value that might need to be set.

Answer 5

Unfortunately, setting the width of the figure instead of using max-width: 100% means that it won't shrink on narrow (mobile) devices. That is, the images will not be responsive. I resorted to inserting <br /> to break up long captions, but I didn't like it. But this obscure CSS feature seems to work for me:

figcaption { display: run-in; width: 150px }

This keeps the image responsive, even though the caption isn't. You can pick your own caption width. I also added margin: auto; text-align: center; to center the caption on a mobile device.