Populating a database in a Laravel migration file

前端 未结 7 1867
不知归路
不知归路 2020-12-07 10:31

I\'m just learning Laravel, and have a working migration file creating a users table. I am trying to populate a user record as part of the migration:

public          


        
相关标签:
7条回答
  • 2020-12-07 11:16

    If you already have filled columns and have added new one or you want to fill out old column with new mock values , do this:

    public function up()
    {
        DB::table('foydabars')->update(
            array(
                'status' => '0'
            )
        );
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 11:18

    Don't put the DB::insert() inside of the Schema::create(), because the create method has to finish making the table before you can insert stuff. Try this instead:

    public function up()
    {
        // Create the table
        Schema::create('users', function($table){
            $table->increments('id');
            $table->string('email', 255);
            $table->string('password', 64);
            $table->boolean('verified');
            $table->string('token', 255);
            $table->timestamps();
        });
    
        // Insert some stuff
        DB::table('users')->insert(
            array(
                'email' => 'name@domain.com',
                'verified' => true
            )
        );
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • Another clean way to do it is to define a private method which create instance et persist concerned Model.

    public function up()
    {
        Schema::create('roles', function (Blueprint $table) {
            $table->increments('id');
            $table->string('label', 256);
            $table->timestamps();
            $table->softDeletes();
        });
    
        $this->postCreate('admin', 'user');
    }
    
    private function postCreate(string ...$roles)  {
        foreach ($roles as $role) {
            $model = new Role();
            $model->setAttribute('label', $role);
            $model->save();
        }
    }
    

    With this solution, timestamps fields will be generated by Eloquent.

    EDIT: it's better to use seeder system to disctinct database structure generation and database population.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 11:24

    I tried this DB insert method, but as it does not use the model, it ignored a sluggable trait I had on the model. So, given the Model for this table exists, as soon as its migrated, I figured the model would be available to use to insert data. And I came up with this:

    public function up() {
            Schema::create('parent_categories', function (Blueprint $table) {
                $table->bigIncrements('id');
                $table->string('name');
                $table->string('slug');
                $table->timestamps();
            });
            ParentCategory::create(
                [
                    'id' => 1,
                    'name' => 'Occasions',
                ],
            );
        }
    

    This worked correctly, and also took into account the sluggable trait on my Model to automatically generate a slug for this entry, and uses the timestamps too. NB. Adding the ID was no neccesary, however, I wanted specific IDs for my categories in this example. Tested working on Laravel 5.8

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 11:29

    Here is a very good explanation of why using Laravel's Database Seeder is preferable to using Migrations: https://web.archive.org/web/20171018135835/http://laravelbook.com/laravel-database-seeding/

    Although, following the instructions on the official documentation is a much better idea because the implementation described at the above link doesn't seem to work and is incomplete. http://laravel.com/docs/migrations#database-seeding

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-07 11:30

    I know this is an old post but since it comes up in a google search I thought I'd share some knowledge here. @erin-geyer pointed out that mixing migrations and seeders can create headaches and @justamartin countered that sometimes you want/need data to be populated as part of your deployment.

    I'd go one step further and say that sometimes it is desirable to be able to roll out data changes consistently so that you can for example deploy to staging, see that all is well, and then deploy to production with confidence of the same results (and not have to remember to run some manual step).

    However, there is still value in separating out the seed and the migration as those are two related but distinct concerns. Our team has compromised by creating migrations which call seeders. This looks like:

    public function up()
    {
        Artisan::call( 'db:seed', [
            '--class' => 'SomeSeeder',
            '--force' => true ]
        );
    }
    

    This allows you to execute a seed one time just like a migration. You can also implement logic that prevents or augments behavior. For example:

    public function up()
    {
        if ( SomeModel::count() < 10 )
        {
            Artisan::call( 'db:seed', [
                '--class' => 'SomeSeeder',
                '--force' => true ]
            );
        }
    }
    

    This would obviously conditionally execute your seeder if there are less than 10 SomeModels. This is useful if you want to include the seeder as a standard seeder that executed when you call artisan db:seed as well as when you migrate so that you don't "double up". You may also create a reverse seeder so that rollbacks works as expected, e.g.

    public function down()
    {
        Artisan::call( 'db:seed', [
            '--class' => 'ReverseSomeSeeder',
            '--force' => true ]
        );
    }
    

    The second parameter --force is required to enable to seeder to run in a production environment.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题