I am migrating a Rails 2.3.8 version to Rails 3.0 and so ive rewritten my routes file. When i list the routes using rake routes
, i see some route names have
It is because your resource is named :planner
instead of :planners
that Rails decided to add the _index to any collection nested underneath. My guess it is there for readability.
The action named in the collection normally translates to a verb, so I can see why this makes sense. Take the typical photos resource example given in the routing docs:
resources :photos do
collection do
get 'search'
end
end
search_photos GET /photos/search(.:format)
But if instead we called the resources 'photo'...
resources :photo do
collection do
get 'search'
end
end
search_photo_index GET /photo/search(.:format)
In the first case, you search the "photos", and in the second case you search the "photo index".
You should be using either resource :planner
either resources :planners
depending on what you need. To learn about singular resource and it differences check out Rails Guides.
Following on from Semyon Perepelitsa's response, note that resource :planner
expects the controller's name is PlannersController
, whereas resources :planners
expects PlannerController
.
If you don't want to rename your controller when changing from resources to resource, you can override the default by specifying resource :planner, controller: :planner
.